My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9528 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9528 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:36:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9528
Author
Martinez, P. and N. P. Nibbelink.
Title
Colorado Nonnative Fish Stocking Regulation Evaluation.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, Laramie.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />The index of threat is highest for green sunfish and largemouth bass. This is largely <br />driven by their prevalence because control measures for these species are about average <br />compared to other species (controls in 30-40% of ponds). White sucker, black bullhead, <br />common carp, bluegill, and black crappie all show a comparatively intermediate level of threat <br />after control, but as stated above, the effectiveness of control of each species depends entirely <br />upon which ponds are controlled. For example, although the overall threat posed by channel <br />catfish and western mosquitofish prior to control measures being applied is low compared to that <br />of other species, their level of threat changes minimally after control measures have been <br />implemented. This indicates that very few of the ponds known to contain these species were <br />subject to control measures, thus these ponds could potentially become future sources of channel <br />catfish and western mosquitofish. The potential threat of mosquitofish and channel catfish in <br />ponds reaching critical habitat would decrease further if control measures were applied to ponds <br />known to contain them, or possibly rise if it was learned that they exist in many more ponds than <br />is currently documented. <br />Pre- and Post-Regulation Fish Stocking_Data <br />From discussions with both private sector and CDOW personnel, it was determined that <br />ten in-state private aquaculturists were likely recent suppliers, from 1998 to 2000, of nonnative, <br />nonsalmonid fishes to Colorado's west slope. Additional inquiries internally indicated that three <br />to four of these vendors probably supplied 90% of the nonnative, nonsalmonid fish species sold <br />to private pond owners in western Colorado. Table 7 summarizes the response of the ten <br />vendors to written requests for voluntary submission of their stocking records for the years 1998- <br />2000. Only three vendors replied to this request for stocking data, with one vendor indicating <br />that they did not sell any nonnative, nonsalmonid fish species during 1998-2000. One vendor <br />provided stocking location information based on DeLorme's (1997) Colorado Atlas & Gazetteer <br />grid coordinates. Another vendor provided address locations specifying a known reservoir name <br />or "pond at residence." The third vendor provided client addresses, but did not specify the pond <br />locations. <br />Based on the three responses received, there were approximately 200 individual stocking <br />incidences for various nonnative, nonsalmonid fish species from 1998 to 2000 in Colorado west <br />of the Continental Divide. Using this rate of stocking activity from the three respondents, it was <br />estimated that an additiona1400 stocking incidences of nonnative, nonsahnonids may have <br />occurred, based on presumed sales for the six non-respondents, during 1998-2000 for which <br />records were unavailable to CDOW via voluntary submission. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />In November 2002, a preliminary summary of this project was presented to the Colorado <br />Fish Health Board to provide an update on the project's progress, and to reiterate the low level of <br />response to the voluntary request for private stocking records. One private attendee at that <br />meeting indicated that the State's legal access to the stocking records (1998-2000) had expired, <br />and that there remained no recourse for requesting or acquiring the data. Given that response, <br />this report was finalized with the knowledge that much extant private stocking data for <br />nonnative, nonsalmonid fishes was inaccessible. Further, it was determined that this known <br />deficiency in the private sector stocking data would preclude any meaningful risk analysis of <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.