My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9528 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9528 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:36:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9528
Author
Martinez, P. and N. P. Nibbelink.
Title
Colorado Nonnative Fish Stocking Regulation Evaluation.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, Laramie.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />at those scales. Specifically, we may expect a strong relationship at 200 m, but a <br />declining or non-existent relationship at 1000 m (Figure 4). <br />2. The cross-correlogram <br />Across-correlogram is a plot of the inter-site correlations as a function of <br />increasing separation distance between locations (Goovaerts 1998). Cross-correlograms <br />can be used in two ways. The most common application is to consider the relationship <br />between different attribute values (e.g. fish density and temperature) within a sample <br />dataset. An alternative, and the way in which we applied the cross-correlogram here, <br />involved focusing on correlations among a similar attribute (fish density, or index of <br />density) across two datasets. The correlation coefficient that is used here was Moran's I. <br />Moran's I is an extension of the cross-product correlation coefficient. Atypical pattern <br />in a correlogram is shown and described in Figure 5. We developed cross correlograms <br />1 between fish density in backwater locations and fish numbers sampled in floodplain <br />ponds. Theoretically, we would expect to see positive correlations at short distances, just <br />as with the scattergram if there were positive associations between pond fish densities <br />and backwater fish densities. The correlogram can also suggest the distance at which this <br />relationship no longer exists. When the correlation is not significantly different from <br />zero, we have reached the distance beyond which there is no longer any "influence" of <br />the source. Therefore, correlograms can be used to suggest spatial scales at which certain <br />patterns exist (Nibbelink 2002). The term "influence" is in quotations because the <br />correlogram does not necessarily imply causation. It is merely a suggestion of pattern. <br />3. The semivariogram <br />Semivariograms are often used in the geostatistical literature to describe spatial <br />patterns in terms of dissimilarity instead of similarity (as with the correlogram). A <br />semivariogram is the average dissimilarity between data separated by a distance (h). A <br />semivariogram is computed as half the mean squared difference between the attributes <br />(fish density) of every data pair (Goovaerts 1998). The primary advantage of the <br />semivariogram is that it is relatively easy to fit one of several types of models to the data <br />it generates. The fitting of a model can yield useful parameters called the range and the <br />sill, which describe components of the spatial relationship observed (Figure 6}. <br />RESULTS <br />Pond, Lake and Reservoir Locations, and Hydrography <br />Figure 7 shows the distribution of ponds, lakes and reservoirs above and below the 6,500- <br />foot contour in Colorado west of the Continental Divide. Out of 3,616 standing waters in the <br />database we compiled (Appendix II), 31 percent (1,104 waters) are located on or below the <br />6,500-foot contour (Table 2). <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.