My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9559
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9559
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:34:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9559
Author
Martinez, A. M.
Title
An Evaluation of Nonnative Fish Control Treatments in Ponds along the Colorado and Gunnison Rivers, 1996-2002.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
18/19,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
re-invasion often occurred via larval fish transported in irrigation water. An isolated 21 <br />SA pond had re-invaded with sand shiners when river water was pumped into the pond <br />for irrigation of lawns. Similarly, landowners have reported seeing larval fish in irrigation <br />head boxes. <br />Screen Installation -- Inlet/outlet screens have the potential to control the <br />movement of nonnative fish from floodplain ponds to critical riverine habitat. One <br />screen that required minimal maintenance was installed below a pond outlet pipe <br />(Figure 11). This screen was constructed of an expanded aluminum grate that was <br />covered with window screen and supported on an aluminum frame. The screen was <br />placed horizontally with a slight tilt in which the corner furthest from the outlet water was <br />lower than the other three corners while the corner closest to the outlet water was <br />higher than the other three corners. This tilt allowed debris to be pushed off the edge of <br />the screen by the out- flowing water pressure. This screen effectively removed fish from <br />the out flowing water and required little maintenance. A similarly constructed screen <br />had a box design and was also placed below an outlet pipe (Figure 12). The <br />effectiveness of this screen was not determined. An additional screen design, which <br />was placed on a surface release outlet pipe, fouled frequently in spite of regular <br />cleaning and was eventually removed from the outlet structure (Figure 13). <br />Two screens designed, constructed, and installed by Irrigation Systems <br />Company of Western Colorado employed a gravel filter design (Figure 14) and a self- <br />cleaning, rotating, flat plate screen design (Figure 15). Fouling was a concern with the <br />gravel screen when it was first installed due to excessive filamentous algae and small <br />gravel size (1"). To rectify this situation, the gravel was removed, larger cobbles (3"-4") <br />were installed, and a fence was placed approximately five feet from the screen to <br />reduce fouling of the screen by floating algae. The flat plate screen had been designed <br />for irrigation ditches and used solar energy as a power source. Moving parts included a <br />rotating brush with two heads and a perforated flat-plate screen. Both screens were <br />installed in the summer of 2000 and functioned well in 2001 and 2002. <br />Shearing wedgewire screens (also known as Coanda screens) were installed on <br />the inlet water to Horsethief Canyon State Wildlife Area's (HTSWA) fields, waterfowl <br />ponds, wetland (Figure 16) and endangered fish grow-out ponds (Figure 17). These <br />34
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.