Laserfiche WebLink
Table 3 cont. <br />Common Name Scientific Name Status <br />Montane meadow mouse <br />Sedge <br />Virgin River thistle <br />Beaver Dam milk vetch <br />Utah Chaetarthria water scavenger <br />beetle <br />Microtus montanus rivularus Candidate 2 <br />Carex haysii Candidate 2. <br />Circium virginensis Candidate 2 <br />Astragalus geyeri var. Candidate 2 <br />triquetrus <br />Chaetarthria utahensis Candidate 2 <br />MacNeill sooty wing skipper Hesperopsis ~racielae Candidate 2 <br />contribute to a species' conservation, however, not all areas proposed as critical habitat may <br />be necessary to prevent extinction. Consequently, some areas or portions of areas may be <br />excluded due to economic considerations, provided that such exclusions would not result in <br />the extinction of the species. <br />Species conservation is related to a number of factors, such as the number of individuals, the <br />amount of habitat, the condition of the species and its habitat, the species' reproductive <br />biology, and the genetic composition of the remaining populations. Many of these factors <br />cannot be determined in a short period of time, especially for wide-ranging or long-lived <br />species. <br />In its designation of critical habitat for the Virgin River fishes, the Service has attempted to <br />conserve habitat for recovery of each species, identifying reaches that contain habitat features <br />needed for spawning, rearing, feeding, and migration. Throughout its previous efforts (e.g., <br />section 7 consultation, research}, the Service has also identified biologically important areas <br />that still contain these listed fishes. Additionally, important reaches have been identified in <br />the Virgin River Fishes Recovery Plan. Although all areas proposed are important to <br />conservation, those areas currently supporting the largest remaining populations may be key <br />to the long-term survival of these species. Additionally, the physical and ecological <br />relationships between these areas is an important consideration. <br />Extinction of these endemic fishes would most likely occur as a result of the presence and <br />continued introductions of nonnative fishes, significant changes in the hydrologic regime, <br />increased fragmentation and channelization, and decreased water quality. Although a single <br />action could result in extinction, the cumulative reduction in suitable habitat resulting from <br />many actions could also lead to species' extinction. The exclusion analysis focuses not only <br />on specific reaches, but also their relationship to other reaches, to evaluate whether or not <br />extinction would be probable if a reach were excluded. Such factors as (1) current <br />population status, (2) habitat quality (e.g., presence of spawning sites, nursery areas, and <br />28 <br />