My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7984
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:33:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7984
Author
Maddux, H. R., L. A. Fitzpatrick and W. R. Noonan.
Title
Colorado River Endangered Fishes Critical Habitat - Draft, Biological Support Document.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Occurrence: <br />Historical <br />Knowledge of the historic abundance of the razorback sucker in the White River is limited. <br />Surveys of the White River, both historic and recent, show that the razorback sucker is rare <br />in these waters. Sigler and Miller (1963) stated that these fish are uncommon in the White <br />River. <br />Recent <br />Recent survey efforts have resulted in few razorback sucker captures (Lanigan and Berry <br />1981, Miller et al. 1982a). Lanigan and Berry (1981) reported one hybrid razorback sucker <br />collected 60 miles up the White River in 1979. In 1987, an adult razorback sucker was <br />captured 18 miles upstream from the Green River (Steve Cranney, UDWR, pers. comm.). <br />Description of Habitat: <br />The lower 18 miles of the White River is dominated by a wide alluvial plain with a sand/silt <br />substrate and occasional areas of exposed bedrock. There are very few riffles and no rapids <br />or deep pools. Several side channels create eddies and backwaters (Miller et al. 1982a). <br />Water development in the White River basin has resulted in changes to historical flows. <br />These changes appear to be relatively minor when compared to other Basin tributaries. <br />Taylor Draw and Rio Blanco Reservoirs are the major impoundments on the White River. <br />These facilities act as barriers, trap sediment, and provide habitat for nonnative fishes. <br />Relationship to Constituent Elements: <br />Water <br />Although extensive water development has not occurred in the White River basin, historical <br />flow patterns have changed. The completion of Taylor Draw Dam near Rangely, Colorado <br />altered flow and sediment transport to downstream reaches. Flows which provide seasonal <br />habitat requirements for razorback suckers still exist. Water quality in the White River has <br />not been discussed as a major issue. However, the concentration of oil, natural gas, and oil <br />shale resources in the White River basin may require future study of water-quality issues. <br />Physical Habitat <br />The habitat characteristics of the lower White River include backwaters, side channels, and <br />secondary channels which are common (Martinez 1986a). Principal habitat types are pool, <br />riffles, eddies, and side channels (Miller et al. 1982a). Backwaters are an important habitat <br />component in the lower portion of this reach; small rapids occur in the upper portion. These <br />55
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.