Laserfiche WebLink
2. Areas where juvenile razorback suckers. have been collected or which could provide <br />suitable nursery habitat (backwaters, flooded bottomlands, or coves). <br />3. Areas presently occupied or that were historically occupied that are considered <br />necessary for recovery and that have the potential for establishment of razorback <br />sucker. <br />4. Areas and water required to maintain rangewide fish distribution, and diversity <br />under a variety of physical, chemical, and biological conditions. <br />5. Areas that need special management or protection to ensure razorback survival and <br />recovery. These areas once met the habitat needs of the razorback sucker and may be <br />recoverable with additional protection and management. <br />RESULTS OF APPLYING PRIMARY CONSTITUENT ELEMENTS AND <br />SELECTION CRITERIA <br />The primary constituent elements were used to determine critical habitat throughout the <br />historical range of the Colorado River endangered fishes. In addition, the five selection <br />criteria described above were also used to evaluate potential razorback sucker critical habitat <br />areas. The proposed critical habitat designations are based on the primary constituent <br />elements, published and unpublished sources, Service reports and other findings, recovery <br />plans (for Colorado squawfish, humpback chub, and bonytail chub), additional selection <br />criteria, and the preliminary recovery goals being presently discussed for the razorback <br />sucker by the Colorado River Fishes Recovery Team. <br />The presence of one or more primary constituent elements or additional selection criteria did <br />not automatically result in inclusion as proposed critical habitat. Rather, the relative value of <br />each constituent element for the survival and recovery of each fish was also evaluated for <br />each reach. In accordance with Section 3(5)(c) of the Act, which states that: "Except in <br />those circumstances determined by the Secretary, critical habitat shall not include the entire <br />geographical area which can be occupied by the threatened or endangered species." <br />Generally, the entire historical range of the fish should not be designated as critical habitat. <br />Selection criteria number 4 was used to maximize the diversity of the selected reaches. <br />As discussed above under Constituent Elements-Physical Habitat, inundated floodplains <br />(bottomland habitats) are important for razorback sucker and Colorado squawfish. These <br />wooded bottomlands, side and secondary channels, oxbow lakes, and floodplain wetlands <br />provide nutrients, food, cover, and other features necessary for various life stages of these <br />fishes. In order to delineate such areas in designating critical habitat, the Service is using the <br />100-year flood elevation (100-year floodplain). In no way is this meant to include all land <br />within the 100-year floodplain as critical habitat, nor does it imply a specific frequency <br />of flooding will be required as part of the rule. Only those areas which provide one or <br />40