My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7984
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:33:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7984
Author
Maddux, H. R., L. A. Fitzpatrick and W. R. Noonan.
Title
Colorado River Endangered Fishes Critical Habitat - Draft, Biological Support Document.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
squawfish in the Green and Yampa Rivers (Tyus 1985; Wick et al. 1986; Tyus 1990). Some <br />authors suggest that repeated use of the same spawning areas may reflect a limited <br />availability of spawning habitats (O'Brien 1984; Archer et al. 1985). However, Tyus (1990) <br />reported that migrating Colorado squawfish pass through many miles of potential spawning <br />habitat to reach specific spawning areas in Yampa Canyon. Colorado squawfish may not <br />spawn annually, and a lack of long-distance migratory behavior has been associated with less <br />than annual spawning and sexual immaturity (Wick et al. 1983; Tyus 1990). <br />One dramatic example of movement was provided by a fish radio-tagged in Gypsum Canyon <br />of upper Lake Powell on April 5, 1982. On July 9, 1982, the fish was in lower Cataract <br />Canyon. The next contact was made above the Black Rocks area of the Colorado River <br />some 160 miles upstream. This was 41 days later and believed related to spawning. At the <br />end of September, the fish was in the Colorado River near Clifton, Colorado, approximately <br />200 miles from its initial downstream location. Not all radio-tagged fish display such <br />dramatic migratory behavior. Radiotelemetry studies conducted in the Grand Valley region <br />of the Colorado River found that movement during April to October was generally limited to <br />25-30 miles ( Archer et al. 1985; Osmundson and Kaeding 1989; McAda and Kaeding 1991). <br />Young Colorado squawfish also undertake movements, and Tyus (1991b) documented diel <br />movements of age 0 and age 1 fish. The young fish moved in response to changing water <br />temperature and water levels. <br />HUMPBACK CHUB (Gila cypha, Miller 1946) <br />The humpback chub is endemic to the Colorado River Basin and is part of a native fish fauna <br />traced to the Miocene epoch in fossil records (Miller 1955; Minckley et al. 1986). Hump- <br />back chub remains have been dated to about 4000 B.C., but the fish was not described as a <br />species until recent times (Miller 1946). This recent discovery has been attributed to its <br />restricted distribution in remote, white water canyons (USFWS 1990b), and its earlier <br />abundance and distribution is not well known. <br />HISTORIC DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE <br />Historic distribution of the humpback chub includes portions of the mainstem Colorado River <br />and four of its tributaries: the Green, Yampa, White, and Little Colorado rivers (Figure 4). <br />However, its original distribution throughout the Basin is not known with certainty. <br />Considerable manmade alteration occurred in the Colorado River before the 1940's, <br />especially in the Lower Basin (Miller 1961), and humpback chub may have disappeared from <br />some river reaches before their existence was documented. For example, Miller (1955) <br />reported remains of this species from an Indian site near Hoover (Boulder) Dam. Thus, the <br />population in this area may have been eliminated when Hoover Dam was built in the 1930's. <br />24
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.