Laserfiche WebLink
LIST OF TABLES <br />Table 1. Alternative 1 locations/situations where nonnative fish <br /> species can be stocked on a routine basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 <br />Table 2. Alternative 2 locations/situations where nonnative fish <br /> species can be stocked on a routine basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 <br />Table 3. Alternative 3 locations/situations where nonnative fish <br /> species can be stocked on a routine basis . . . . . . . . . . . 13 <br />Table 4. Alternative 4 locations/situations where nonnative fish <br /> species can be stocked on a routine basis . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 15 <br />Table 5. Alternative 5 locations/situations where nonnative fish <br /> species can be stocked on a routine basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 <br />Table 6. List of-nonnative fish species (common names) that occur in <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin, but are not currently managed <br />(stocked) and their status under each of the alternatives <br />(C/C = case-by-case review; No = Prohibited from being stocked; <br />Yes = could be stocked without case-by-case review). . . . . . . . 17 <br />Table 7. Comparison of alternatives in regards to floodplain pond fish <br />stocking within critical habitat . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 <br />Table 8. Comparison of alternatives for future warmwater fish stocking <br />and management outside or above critical habitat. . . . . . . . . . 19 <br />Table 9. Summary of expected very positive (++), somewhat positive (+), <br />somewhat negative (-), very negative (--), or neutral (0) impacts <br />of each of the alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 <br />i i i