Laserfiche WebLink
current fishing in the floodplain is below the 50-year floodplain and <br />would have to be trout only. Localized losses in fishing opportunities <br />would occur, especially during summer months. if alternative fisning <br />locations were not obtained. <br />D <br />3. Recovery of Endangered Fishes: The reduction of nonnative fishes <br />escaping into the river would decrease, somewhat, competition with and <br />predation on the endangered fishes. Survival of eggs, larvae, and <br />juveniles of the endangered fishes would slightly increase. Other <br />recovery actions would exhibit measurable positive responses in the <br />endangered fish populations. <br />4. Economy: Costs of berming ponds to FEMA standards could be <br />significant, although few ponds exist between the 50- and 100-year <br />floodplains. Stocking of private ponds would decrease causing economic <br />impacts to the aquaculture industry and loss of future fishing <br />opportunities in private ponds. Stocking of rainbow trout produced by <br />the aquaculture industry should correspondingly increase. The change in <br />overall fishing days in Colorado would be minimal. This alternative may <br />reduce fishing expenditures by some unknown amount. As an example, if <br />future warmwater fishing opportunities are reduced by 20 surface acres, <br />assuming 100 days fishing/acre at $40/day expenditure, the direct <br />economic impact could be $80,000/year: if reduced by 100 surface acres <br />the direct impact would be $400,000/year. <br />Alternative 3. <br />1. Aquatic Biological Resources: Numbers and abundance of nonnative <br />fishes in the river would decrease. Chances of escapement would be <br />eliminated for flows less than the 100-year flow event, except from <br />private ponds that are not reclaimed. Nonnative fishes would still <br />occur in the floodplain but their numbers would be greatly reduced. <br />Certain species could not be stocked within the basin. Nongame <br />nonnative fishes with established riverine populations would continue to <br />be a major problem. <br />2. Recreation: Recreational opportunities in Utah and Wyoming would be <br />unaffected by this alternative, except that new ponds stocked with <br />largemouth bass, bluegill, and black crappie would have to be outside <br />the 100-year floodplain. In Colorado, future private ponds below the <br />100-year floodplain wishing to have fishing would have to purchase trout <br />rather than warmwater fishes from the aquaculture industry. Ponds would <br />probably not be suitable for trout during summer months. Fishing in <br />private ponds would be concentrated during spring and fall months. <br />Private ponds that currently have warmwater fishing would retain it, <br />unless they voluntarily allowed their pond to be reclaimed. If their <br />warmwater fishery collapsed for some reason, the pond could only be <br />restocked with trout. If the same level of warmwater fishing <br />opportunities in Colorado are to be maintained. Colorado and the <br />Recovery Program would have to seek opportunities elsewhere. This might <br />include agreements with entities such as water districts that own waters <br />not currently available to the public for fishing. Most of Colorado's <br />30