8231 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

with local fishing opportunities. When asked which type of warmwater fishing opportunity they would like to see. the greatest percentage (44 percent) stated they would like more large reservoirs. 2. Utah: Anglers in Utah fished 2.7 million days in 1991 (U.S. Department of the Interior 1993) and increased to 5.6 million days in 1996. Of this, approximately 30 percent of the days were spent warmwater fishing. Currently, Utah's only plan for stocking warmwater species in the Upper Basin is possibly smallmouth bass in Strawberry Reservoir in the Duchesne River drainage. 3. Wyoming: In 1994, Wyoming issued 115.148 resident fishing licenses. Anglers currently fish an estimated 4.2 days annually. Comparisons between in 1988 and 1994 indicated that.anglers places less importance on catching fish and more on the aesthetic features of this activity (Wenzel and Hubert 1995). The desire to have more warmwater fishing also declined from 1988 to 1994. However, recent fishing pressure surveys indicate a continued increase in reservoir and warmwater demand. Most anglers preferred fishing for trout (especially wild trout). C. Recovery of Endangered Fishes In a survey conducted by Colorado State University (1995), 75 percent of the respondents and 72 percent of the anglers felt that stocking of nonnative fish should only be done if it does not harm endangered fishes. Only 34 percent of the respondents supported the practice of stocking nonnative fishes in the upper Colorado River Basin. although 54 percent supported stocking mosquitofish and grass carp for insect and vegetation control, respectively. Warmwater anglers in Delta, Garfield. Mesa, and Montrose counties, Colorado opposed (55 percent) recovery efforts for the endangered fish that included removing warmwater sport fish from ponds next to the river: 32 percent of the warmwater anglers supported this proposed practice (Colorado Division of Wildlife 1996). D. Economy 1. Water Development: The Recovery Program for the endangered fishes in the Upper Basin was established as a way to recover the fish while allowing water development to proceed. By implementing recovery actions such as floodplain restoration, broodstock development, and controlling nonnative fishes, the recovery program serves as a reasonable and prudent alternative for Section 7 compliance with the Endangered Species Act. This simplifies the regulatory requirements for water development projects both large and small. Without the Recovery Program continuing to make sufficient progress towards recovery, billions of dollars of water development and subsequent economic growth could be impacted. The ability of the Recovery Program to serve as a reasonable and prudent alternative for water development was reduced in 1996. One reason for this was the lack of action to address nonnative fish problems and implement solutions. Stocking procedures that contribute significantly towards the recovery of the fish will, in part, allow the Recovery Program to serve as a reasonable and prudent alternative for water 24