Laserfiche WebLink
Table 7. Comparison of alternatives in regards to floodplain pond fish <br />stocking within critical habitat. <br />Management/Prevention <br />Activity and/or Strategy No Alt Alt Alt <br />Action # 1 #-2 # 3 Alt <br />#. 4 Alt <br /># 5 <br />Trout stocking: encouraged <br />0-10 yr Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes <br />10-50 r Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes <br />50-100 yr Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes" <br />>100 yr L Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes <br />Stock largemouth bass, bluegill, and <br />black crappie: isolated/screened <br />ponds <br />0-10 yr Yes 14 *C/C No No Yes" No <br />10-50 yr Yes C/C No No Yes Yes <br />50-100 yr Yes C/C Yes No Yes Yes <br />>100 yr Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes <br />Certified triploid grass carp: <br />isolated/screened ponds <br />0-10 yr Yes C/C No No Yes No <br />10-50 yr Yes C/C No No Yes No <br />50-100 yr Yes C/C Yes Yes Yes Yes <br />>100 yr Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes <br />*C/C would require a case-by-case review prior to occurring. <br />14 Stocking under the "No Action" alternative would be completely at the discretion of the State fish and Wildlife agency, <br />but would probably not occur unless the pond was bermed to FEMA standards; 5 feet above OHWL. <br />15 Stocking permitted only if pond bermed to FEMA standards; 5 feet above OHWL. <br />18