My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8231
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8231
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:33:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8231
Author
Maddux, H. R.
Title
Draft Environmental Assessment For Procedures For Stocking Of Nonnative Fish Species In The Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
D. ALTERNATIVE 2 <br />This alternative would allow stocking of largemouth bass. bluegill, black <br />crappie. triploid grass carp, and mosquitofish in isolated ponds above the <br />50-year floodplain of critical habitat in ponds that are bermed to FEMA <br />standards five feet above the OHWL and in connected waters that are adequately <br />screened. Largemouth bass. bluegill, black crappie, channel catfish, triploid <br />grass carp, mosquitofish, and fathead minnows could be routinely stocked in <br />isolated ponds and reservoirs upstream of critical habitat if bermed to FEMA <br />standards five feet above the OHWL. The following fish species would be <br />prohibited from being stocked in any waters in the basin: northern pike. <br />tiger muskie, common carp, red shiner, black bullhead, wiper. green sun-fish. <br />yellow perch, walleye. and white crappie. <br />Prior to implementing the routine stocking, the Recovery Program would conduct <br />a peer reviewed study to evaluate the effectiveness of the ISMP to detect <br />changes in the survivability and/or abundance of routinely stocked fish. <br />Unless the study conclusively demonstrated that the ISMP is effective for <br />tracking nonnative fishes, a program would have to be implemented to do so. <br />If it is determined that nonnative fish escapement is occurring or that the <br />survivability and abundance of a nonnative species is increasing in occupied <br />habitat, then routine stocking of that species would be discontinued. <br />Subsequent stockings of that species would then require case-by-case review <br />until the problem is addressed. <br />Instances when and where nonnative fishes can be stocked on a routine basis <br />(not requiring a case-by-case review) are presented in Table 2. Stocking of <br />nonnative fishes that are not managed or not prohibited in the Upper Basin at <br />the present time or are not included under routine stocking would require <br />evaluation on a case-by-case basis to ensure that the proposed stocking of <br />these fishes will not adversely affect the endangered fishes. <br />11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.