Laserfiche WebLink
attempt to relocate Colorado squawfish 40:804. During the afternoon the area from RM 103.7 <br />upstream to RM 105.0 was scanned by foot. Squawfish 40:804 was not relocated. <br />At various times during 24-hour observations Colorado squawfish were found occupying most of <br />the available habitats in the Yampa River. The 24-hour observations indicate that Colorado <br />squawfish utilized a variety of habitats and micro-habitats in the Yampa River, Colorado. The <br />range of habitats, depths and velocities used by Colorado squawfish were different between day <br />and night. During most environmental conditions (excluding events of high water and turbidity) <br />squawfish prefer deep pools during the day where they remain mostly inactive. Results of 24- <br />hour observations during the past two years suggest that most movement between habitats and <br />river locations occurs at night. Additionally the data suggests that foraging activity also occurs <br />at night. The specific area used during "foraging activity" probably depends on a variety of <br />environmental conditions as well as individual fish preference. The data suggests that the side <br />margins, and upper and lower ends of pools were used primarily during the low water condition <br />that prevailed during 1996. Observations during 1997 (a higher water year) indicate that most <br />fish moved into shallow runs or riffles during the night and showed a foraging type behavior <br />similar to 1996. The depths of most habitats used at night were shallower than habitats used <br />during the day. Colorado squawfish were located in or observed moving through a wide range f <br />velocities at night. <br />Habitat Use <br />Colorado squawfish almost exclusively used pools throughout the observation period from July <br />through October (Figures 62 and 63). Two of the five fish implanted did use run habitat but onl <br />occasionally during the entire eight weeks of observations conducted on the river. In addition, <br />one fish used an eddy pool, but less than 5% of the time of observation. Channel catfish used <br />pools most of the time but also used runs (Figure 64). Catfish used run habitat more frequently <br />than Colorado squawfish and is probably indicative of a difference in feeding behavior or gener. <br />habitat differences. <br />Northern pike, like Colorado squawfish, mainly used pools during the study. There was some <br />backwater habitat used by these fish. This was the only species that was observed using the <br />backwater habitat during the low flow period (Figure 65). <br />Observations in 1997 focused on 24 hour observations to develop a larger data set fbr daytime <br />and nighttime habitat use patterns for Colorado squawfish. There was a distinct difference ove <br />24 hour cycle for all of the squawfish. The fish showed what appeared to be a resting activity <br />during daytime hours and a feeding activity after sunset then returned to a resting mode at <br />sunrise. This pattern was shown in all of the 24 hour observations in 1997. The few 24 hour <br />observations conducted in 1996 also showed this pattern of behavior. <br />The combined 24 hour observations show a strong use of pool habitat and eddies in 1996 and a <br />pool and run use in 1997 based on the percent of time monitored (Figure 2). The daytime hou <br />contacts are very similar to that of the combined 24 hour observations, 1997 and 1996 (Figure <br />63). <br />Final Report - Colorado squash habitat Page 77 <br />Miller Ecological Consultants, Inc. December 17, 1997 <br />a