Laserfiche WebLink
DISCUSSION <br />Flows <br />Flow volume in the Yampa River in 1996 was approximately 1,000 cfs at mid-July when fish <br />capture and implementation began. It dropped to 79 cfs on September 6 and then rose back up to <br />close to 400 cfs by late October, at the end of the study. The river flow was less than 100 cfs for <br />two days, September 5 and 6. Typically, flow drops to a minimum in September but increased <br />by October. The 1996 summer flows are low compared to most years. <br />Flow magnitude in the Yampa River in 1997 was much higher than observed in 1996. Flows in <br />late July were approximately 1,000 cfs, compared to 600 cfs in 1996 but flow remained over 700 <br />cfs for the majority of July and August and was up to 1,650 cfs during the second week in <br />August. Minimum base flow in the summer of 1997 was observed on September 12 and 13 at <br />320 cfs. By September 18, a rainstorm in the upper Yampa caused an increase in flow to nearly <br />7,000 cfs in the study area. Flow remained over 1,400 cfs to the final week of observations in <br />1997. Fish response to flows in 1997 showed that the peak flow with high sediment caused most <br />of the fish to move downstream some distance from their observed locations for the majority of <br />the summer. This response was shown for all observed squawfish during the week with the high <br />flows. <br />Radio Telemetry <br />Colorado squawfish exhibited both local and long distance movement patterns throughout the <br />study. One fish moved approximately 7 miles upstream and then moved downstream 6%i miles <br />in 1996. This particular fish moved upstream during a time when flows were lowest in the <br />summer and moved back downstream in the fall at higher flow rates. Apparently the 1996 flows <br />did not prevent the upstream movement through shallow riffles or the Patrick Sweeney Diversion <br />structure. Other fish in 1996 moved locally and stayed within the same river mile. <br />On most 24 hour observations there were local movements of several hundred feet by the fish <br />that were being observed with movement peaking after dusk. Movement activity increased after <br />dark with fish moving either upstream or downstream to a probable feeding location and then <br />returned to the original observation point. <br />Channel catfish and northern pike showed little movement during the study. Most of these fish <br />remained in the same river mile where they were originally captured with the exception of two <br />channel catfish that moved downstream approximately 4 miles at the late October observation <br />period. One was observed by the ground crew; the other was observed only by air contact. <br />During the only 24 hour observation of a northern pike, the fish exhibited similar local <br />movement as the Colorado squawfish. Activity increased after dusk. The fish moved upstream <br />several hundred feet. That movement peaked just before midnight and the fish returned back to <br />its original location before dawn the next day. <br />Final Report - Colorado squawfish habitat Page 72 <br />Miller Ecological Consultants, Inc. December 17, 1997