Laserfiche WebLink
Habitat Suitability Curves <br />Twedt and Holden (1980) developed habitat suitability curves for Colorado squawfish in the San <br />Juan. The curves indicate that adult fishes habitat use varies. Adults used depths of 2-4 feet during <br />all seasons. Velocities used by adults varied by time of year. In early spring, prior to runoff, fish <br />were found in velocities of 1-1.5 feet per second (ft/s). During runoff squawfish used velocities <br />from 0 - 2 ft/s. Adult substrate use also varied between seasonal periods. Colorado squawfish <br />predominantly used silt and sand substrates found in backwaters during spring runoff. A variety of <br />substrates (silt, sand, gravel with cover) were used in pre and post runoff periods. Age-0 and <br />juvenile curves showed a much narrower habitat use than adults. Young squawfish use backwaters <br />1-2 feet deep with velocities less than 0.2 ft/s and silt substrate. Because adult curves were <br />developed with a limited data base (n = 156), Twedt and Holden (1980) expressed concern over the <br />validity of such curves. This data, like the habitat availability data, was compiled from daytime <br />observations. <br />METHODS <br />The project consisted of tracking fish implanted with transmitters to determine their location, <br />habitat use, and movement within a reach of river. Ten adult Colorado squawfish, five adult <br />channel catfish, and five adult northern pike were opportunistically implanted with radio <br />transmitters in a cooperative effort by personnel from Miller Ecological Consultants, Colorado <br />Division of Wildlife, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in 1996 and 1997 (Table 1). <br />Four Colorado squawfish and three northern pike were collected by angling, all other fish were <br />collected by electrofishing. Radio transmitters were implanted using procedures developed by <br />the USFWS. Fish were anesthetized with MS-222 and transmitters were surgically implanted <br />into the gut cavity. Fish were observed in a recovery tank for a minimum of ten minutes. When <br />fully recovered, they were released back into the habitat from which they were captured. <br />Radio tracking was conducted on a biweekly basis from July 22, 1996 through October 26, 1996 <br />and July 20, 1997 through September 26, 1997. Observations were made on five consecutive <br />days each week that tracking was conducted. An attempt was made to locate all fish at least once <br />each observation week. After a fish was located it was monitored for a minimum of 30 minutes <br />(Colorado squawfish were monitored for a minimum of one hour). During this monitoring <br />period, the date, time of day, weather conditions, water and ambient air temperature, time <br />monitored, sketch of the surrounding habitat including fish locations, and any observations of <br />local movement were recorded. Other physical habitat data that were collected whenever <br />possible included habitat type, total water depth, water velocity (mean column and bottom), <br />substrate type, proximity to cover, description of cover at the location, general description of the <br />site, and measurements of the habitat including length, width, bank features, shoreline <br />vegetation, dominant substrate and cover. Discharge was obtained from the USGS gaging <br />station near Maybell, Colorado. <br />The 24-hour observations were conducted in both 1996 and 1997 on Colorado squawfish. One <br />Colorado squawfish was monitored for a continuous 24-hour period during each observation <br />week. This fish was located and observed for movement approximately every hour except for <br />some short periods when weather interfered. All observed activity and movement by fish during <br />this time was recorded. <br />Final Report - Colorado squawfish habitat Page 6 <br />Miller Ecological Consultants, Inc. December 17, 1997