My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7845
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7845
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:29:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7845
Author
Miller, W. J. and D. Laiho.
Title
Final Report, Upper Colorado River Basin Recovery Implementation Program, Feasibility Evaluation Of Non-Native Fish Control Structures.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A <br />1 <br />1 <br />t <br /> <br />1 <br />A <br />1 <br /> <br />r <br /> <br /> <br />f <br />e <br />J <br /> <br />1 <br />All screened material and water that would flow off the end of the screen would be collected in a <br />sump. Water and the screened material would be pumped to vibrating screens that would remove <br />excess water from the screened material. The vibrating screen proved to be an effective relatively <br />maintenance free, device to remove excess water from the screened material. The screened material <br />would then be pumped to a lagoon system. The lagoon system would need to contain enough cells to <br />allow drying and sludge removal. Total lagoon area would be approximately 30 to 40 acres to <br />handle the design flow. The facility would need to be heated and ventilated, and equipped within <br />engine generator to provide emergency standby power. <br />The total construction cost for the screening facility was estimated to be $40,000,000 in 1981 dollars. <br />As many as thirty full-time employees could possibly be needed to operate the facility with a total <br />yearly operating budget of $1,300,000. <br />1.3.9.3 Havasu Pump Plant <br />The Havasu Pumping Plant (HPP) is located adjacent to Lake Havasu approximately 20 miles <br />northeast of Parker, Arizona in Yuma County. HPP delivers water from Lake Havasu into the 335 <br />mile canal system of the Central Arizona Project (CAP). The CAP was authorized in 1968 to deliver <br />water from the Colorado River, via Lake Havasu; to central and southern Arizona for agricultural, <br />municipal, and industrial purposes. HPP is designed to pump a maximum of 3,000 cfs. Water <br />deliveries consistently increased from approximately 108,000 to 900,000 acre-feet during 1986 <br />through 1990 with most of the water being pumped from March through September. Lake Pleasant <br />is an off-canal storage reservoir on the Agua Fria River approximately 150 miles downstream of <br />HPP. Lake Pleasant was enlarged in 1993 allowing for more storage of canal waters delivered <br />through HPP for the CAP.. The majority of water diverted at HPP is now during the winter months. <br />This water is stored in Lake Pleasant and released to CAP during the summer months. <br />'The potential introduction and colonization of non-native fish species into the CAP, and <br />subsequently into natural Arizona water, have been a concern since the initiation of pumping at HPP. <br />Non-native fish species are considered a threat to native species in several of the Arizona river <br />systems that are part of the CAP. Even though fish mortalities will occur at HPP, some fish will <br />survive and be transported to the lower portions of the Salt and Verde Rivers. Studies have <br />determined that approximately 17 species of non-native fish have colonized extensively in the CAP. <br />Large non-native fish have been found in the canal directly downstream of HPP which would <br />indicate that all life stages could be entrained. Several studies were conducted to estimate the <br />number of eggs and larvae that might be entrained at HPP. These studies estimated entrainment rates <br />of approximately 3 million larvae per 10 pumping hours and 0.08 eggs per cubic meter. <br />Several screening options were studied to limit the introduction of non-native fish species into the <br />CAP system. Five fish screening/barrier alternatives were developed at a conceptual level for the <br />HPP. The five alternatives are as follows: <br />• Fish Screens Upstream of HPP with Fish Bypass. <br />• Fish Screens Mounted to Existing Trashracks Located Upstream of HPP with no Fish Bypass. <br />• Fish Screens Downstream of HPP with Fish Destruction. <br />• Electrical Barrier Downstream of HPP with Fish Destruction. <br />• Combination of Fish Screen Upstream of HPP with Electrical Barrier Downstream of HPP. <br />Control Structure Feasibility Evaluation <br />Miller Ecological Consultants, Inc., February 18, 1997 <br />1-30
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.