Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Typical Disadvantages <br />Effectiveness for repelling salmonids is unknown; data is needed for those species <br />There have been design and operational problems with experimental underwater strobe systems <br />The field testing to date has been limited so that success is unknown <br />' Application to Limiting Downstream Passage. Light systems are generally used to either deter <br />fish from a spillway or intake area or direct them toward a bypass area. In both applications on this <br />project, that would require fish handling if the fish are directed to a fish bypass area. In addition, <br />several species have been shown not to be affected by the light systems and the light systems <br />' currently have limited application in daylight hours. This would effectively not deter fish at all times <br />as the criteria for this project are designed. <br />1.3.7.4 Louvers <br />' Characteristics. Louvers consist of a series of vertical parallel bars spaced from 1 to 12 inches <br />apart and the entire structure angled to flow across the entire channel. This physical device relies on <br />the fish's behavioral response to flow turbulence. The fish approach the louver system tail first, <br />' sense the turbulence created by the louvers and move laterally away from the device. This <br />movement directs them to the bypass area. <br />Typical Existing Application. Louvers have been installed on both the east and west coast rivers. <br />Installed facilities include canals with widths up to 145 feet and maximum capacity of 7,000 cfs. <br />Guidance efficiency ranged up to 87% of downstream migrants in some applications for actively <br />swimming life stages. In general, guidance efficiency was less than 80%. Louvers did not <br />' effectively guide smaller life stages and are not effective on passive life stages. <br />Typical Advantages <br />• Louvers are adequately tested <br />• Louvers can be retrofitted in many designs <br />' Typical Disadvantages <br />• Diversion efficiency lower than agency standards in some applications <br />• Louvers are size and species specific as far as guidance efficiency <br />0 Potential problems due to clogging arise at some locations <br />• Louvers are relatively expensive. <br />• Louvers require diversion of the fish and fish handling <br />• Large openings do not exclude fish <br />' Application to Limiting Downstream Passage. Louvers are designed to guide actively swimming <br />life stages. The current project includes potential escapement of passive life stages exiting the <br />' reservoirs. The effectiveness of louvers on passive life stages and the relatively low efficiency (less <br />than 80%) preclude the use of this control option at the subject reservoirs. <br /> <br />Control Structure Feasibility Evaluation 1-25 <br />' Miller Ecological Consultants, Inc., February 18, 1997