Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />I Figure 1-1. Example Modified Inclined Screen <br /> <br /> STOPL SLOT FlSH BYPASS 9 <br /> 60 <br /> 0 <br /> <br /> <br /> SOLID MATE <br />? <br />-? <br />~ P1AW <br /> I <br />;; <br /> STRU <br />SSUPPO? <br /> <br /> 7777 <br />. <br />.1 m WITH A IS• INCLINED SCREEN <br />SEMON <br />TRAM BACK Pull BYPASS `Ir <br />1 <br />0.6 m <br />INCLINED SCREEN <br />e + --? <br />s- SOLID <br />PLATB <br />14 m WITH A 13• INCLINED SCREEN _ <br />CAM <br />(Source: Taft et al. 1995) <br />1.3.4.2 Eicher <br /> Characteristics. The Eicher screen is a developing technology that is intended to divert fish at <br /> significantly higher approach velocities than conventional screen designs. It is named after biologist <br /> George Eicher who first developed the idea in the late 1970's as a better means of safely bypassing <br />fish around a turbine. The basic Eicher screen is elliptical in shape and designed to fit inside the <br /> pressure penstock at an incline to flow (Figure 1-2). Non-penstock designs are also being developed. <br /> Fish are diverted up to the penstock roof where a bypass conduit is located. Rather than being <br />designed to guide all target fish to a bypass without contact with the screen, the screen is constructed <br /> of very smooth stainless steel profile wire to minimize injury to fish that contact the screen. Debris <br /> is removed by rotating the screen about a pivotal shaft which allows flow across the reversed screen <br /> surface. During debris flushing, fish escapement may occur. This screen has been shown to operate <br /> successfully under a range of velocities up to a maximum of about 8 ft/sec. It is relatively less <br /> expensive and has smaller space requirements than most current barrier screen designs. Since it is <br /> installed in the penstock, forebay area is not required, nor is icing a problem. In addition, since the <br /> screen operates at much higher velocities, predation of bypassed species is reduced. Head loss may <br /> be significant (up to 2 feet) due to high velocities and baffling needed to obtain uniform flow. <br /> During backflushing, the flow distribution into a turbine may be affected. <br />Control Structure Feasibility Evaluation 1-$ <br />Miller Ecological Consultants, Inc., February 18, 1997