Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 1. General success of supplementation with hatchery fish to returning adult. <br />Good <br />Success -- > --------------------- > ---------------------- > --------------------- > Poor Success <br />Increasing length of freshwater residency <br />Good <br />Success -- > --------------------- > ---------------------- > --------------------- > Poor Success <br />Increasing distance from ocean <br />Good <br />Success -- > --------------------- > ---------------------- > --------------------- > Poor. Success <br />Increasing distance between stocks used <br />Good <br />Success -- > --------------------- > <br />> --------------------- > Poor Success <br />Lake rearing Main river rearing Stream rearing <br />Introduced hatchery fish will augment the number of returning adults to a particular <br />area, but if the factors which originally caused the natural runs to decline are not <br />corrected, production will not significantly change. In fact, in some cases the presence of <br />additional hatchery adults can lead to increased exploitation; thus decreasing the natural <br />production even faster. In some studies, wild/natural stocks were shown to be more <br />viable than hatchery stocks. Thus, replacing wild/natural fish with hatchery fish, and <br />cross breeding wild/natural and hatchery fish, can result in less viable production. <br />(Bjornjn and Steward 1990). <br />If su~hplementation is ever going to be successful with hatchery fish, we must make major <br />charges in hatchery management. We must make the fish as compatible with the <br />environment (outplanting site) as possible. The hatchery mind-set works against fish- <br />en~v~ionment compatibility. Changes that appear insignificant at the hatchery, e.g., <br />wring program, outplant timing, and marking etc., can seriously affect the success of <br />supplementation. However, when hatchery experts were questioned, 53 percent <br />responded that fish culture decisions are based primarily on human efficiency not <br />resource concerns (Diggs 1984}. <br />( Does supplementation of anadromous fish work? We believe that it can work, although <br />success varies dramatically by (1) species, (2) stock, (3) area, and (4) method or type of <br />f supplementation. Also, success depends on goals we are trying to achieve. If we look at <br />natural production, we have very few successful examples. The two basic questions <br />asked in the supplementation "Proposed Five-Year Work Plan", prepared by the <br />Supplementation Technical Work Group (1988), are considered still quite valid. "What <br />39 <br />