Laserfiche WebLink
60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />w 0 <br />U <br />Z <br />W <br />~ 60 <br />U <br />0 40 <br />w <br />20 <br />z 0 <br />w <br />0 <br />0 <br />w <br />~- 60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />^ ~S <br />~ ~~ <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />^ ~S <br />RS <br />^ ~S <br />-~ CH <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />^ ~S <br />SD <br />CS <br />FH <br />', ^ cs <br />-~ ss <br />-S -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -S -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 S <br />FACTOR 1 FACTOR 1 <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />Figure 10. Distribution of Colorado squawfish and the six species for which <br />comparisons were made along discriminant function one, Green <br />River, RM 212-320, 1980. The relative contribution of the measured <br />habitat variables to discriminant function one is provided in Table <br />6. (CS=Colorado squawfish, RS=red shiner, SS-sand shiner, CH=Gila <br />spp., CC=channel catfish, FHAfathead minnow, and SD=speckled dace). <br />25 <br />