Laserfiche WebLink
40 ~- II ~ ~ CS f 60 <br />~~ CC~40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />w <br />U <br />Z <br />W <br />~ 60 <br />U <br />~ 40 <br />0 <br />0 20 <br />} <br />z 0 <br />w <br />O <br />W <br />~ 60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />20 <br />0 <br />60 <br />CS <br />CH 40 <br />1 20 <br />~o <br />0 <br />-5-4-3 -2 -i 0 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> CS <br />FH <br />I <br />1~~~~i~_ <br />FACTOR <br /> C S -, <br />RS <br />~~~<<~, <br />FACTOR 1 <br />Figure 8. Distribution of Colorado squawfish and the six species for which <br />comparisons were made along discriminant function one, Green <br />River, RM 212-320, 1979. The relative contribution of the measured <br />habitat variables to discriminant function one is provided in Table <br />b. (CS=Colorado squawfish, RS=red shiner, SS=sand shiner, CH=Gila <br />spp., CC=channel catfish, FH=fathead minnow, and SD=speckled dace). <br />23 <br />-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 <br />