Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />t <br />1 <br />1 <br />i~ <br />t <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />i~ <br />t <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />between 0.36 and 0.82 (Tables 3 and 4). They were significantly correlated <br />only in one instance in backwaters in the Colorado River. The C/E of red <br />shiners was significantly correlated with that of Colorado squawfish in all <br />habitats combined and in backwaters in three of the four cases examined in the <br />Colorado River (r = 0.4-0.7). However, they were significantly correlated <br />only in one instance in the Green River. The C/E of sand shiners was <br />significantly correlated with Colorado squawfish in riverwide samples in <br />backwaters and in all habitats combined in the Colorado River, but in only one <br />instance in the Green River. This may reflect the greater abundance of sand <br />shiners in the Colorado River than in the Green River. The C/E of the other <br />species examined was infrequently correlated with that of Colorado squawfish <br />(Tables 3 and 4). <br />Discussion <br />Based on our analyses, only limited habitat partitioning was evident <br />between Colorado squawfish and the six sympatric species examined. Age-0 <br />Colorado squawfish showed no habitat separation with three introduced fishes-- <br />red shiner, sand shiner and fathead minnow (Tables 1 and 2). The C/E of <br />Colorado squawfish and each of these three species was weakly correlated in <br />many instances in the Colorado and Green rivers (Tables 3 and 4). The weak <br />correlations may result, in part, from the great abundance of red shiner and <br />fathead minnow when compared to the rare Colorado squawfish. In contrast, the <br />habitat overlap of Colorado squawfish with the two native species examined-- <br />Gila spp. and speckled dace--was only moderately high and less than that of <br />Colorado squawfish with any of the introduced species. McAda and Tyus (1980) <br />13 <br />1 <br />