My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8166
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8166
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:27:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8166
Author
McAda, C. W. and L. R. Kaeding.
Title
Relations Between the Habitat Use of Age-0 Colorado Squawfish and Those of Other Sympatric Fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
along a transect that passed through the center of the area sampled. These <br /> values were then averaged for each seine haul. Dominant substrate type was <br /> estimated visually and by feel. For analysis, the substrate code was given a <br /> numeric value equal to the mid-point of the range of particle sizes given by <br /> Hynes ([1970] silt - 0.07 mm, sand - 1.1 mm, gravel - 9 mm, rubble - 16 mm). <br />i <br /> Multiple discriminant analysis (Green 1979) was used to compare habitats <br />used by age-0 Colorado squawfish with those used by each of six common <br />sympatric species (red shiner Notronis lutrensis, sand shiner N. stramineus, <br />channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus, speckled dace Rhinichthvs osculus, <br />fathead minnow Pimephales promelas, and Gila spp.). Discriminant analysis <br />allows a researcher to "discriminate" between groups on the basis of a set of <br />habitat characteristics, to determine how well the groups discriminate, and to <br />determine which habitat characteristics are the most powerful discriminators <br />(Klecka 1984). Discriminant analysis employs a simple linear combination <br />(canonical discriminant function) of the discriminating variables to maximize, <br />the separation among the groups. The relative contribution of the <br />discriminating variables to the separation of groups along the canonical <br />function is measured by the correlation between the variables and the <br />dependent canonical factors. Wilks' lambda is a multivariate measure of group <br />differences over the discriminating variables (Klecka 1984). Lambda is an <br />inverse measure of the group differences such that a value of zero represents <br />complete discrimination between the groups and a value of one represents no <br />discrimination between groups. The discriminating habitat variables used in <br />this analysis were mean water depth, mean water-column velocity and dominant <br />substrate size. The variables were weighted according to the catch per effort <br />(C/E; number of fish/mz seined) for each species in the seine haul and were <br />t <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.