Laserfiche WebLink
looo <br />800 <br />600 <br />400 <br />200 <br />0 <br />Colorado River <br />!6 67 !e !9 90 91 92 9s 91 % % <br />1000 <br />800 <br />600 <br />400 <br />.C 200 <br />~ o <br />J <br />v <br />~ looo <br />~ 800 <br />600 <br />400 <br />200 <br />0 <br />Lower Colorado River <br />t6 67 ~! t9 90 91 92 9s 91 96 % <br />~ ~ ~ <br />~~~~ <br />Upper Colorado River <br />e6 e7 ea !9 9o w 92 93 91 % % <br />1000 <br />aoo <br />600 <br />400 <br />200 <br />0 <br />White River <br />1000 <br />800 <br />600 <br />400 <br />200 <br />0 <br />1000 <br />800 <br />600 <br />400 <br />200 <br />0 <br />loon <br />800 <br />600 <br />400 <br />200 <br />0 <br />1000 <br />800 <br />600 <br />400 <br />200 <br />0 <br />Green River <br />1 <br />e6 67 !8 !9 90 91 92 9s 94 % % <br />Lower Green River <br />!6 p !! !9 90 91 92 93 91 46 % <br />Upper Green River <br />e6 87 e8 s9 90 91 92 9J 94 % % <br />Yampa River <br />~~~~~ ~~ <br />!6 07 !6 89 90 91 92 93 94 % % !6 07 8S 89 90 91 92 93 94 % 96 <br />Year Year <br />Figure 14.-Median total length (*), central fifty percent of the length-frequency distribution (cross <br />bazs), and minimum and maximum lengths (end bazs) of Colorado squawfish collected from the Green, <br />Colorado, White, and Yampa Rivers during spring ISMP monitoring, 1986-1996. Lower Green River <br />= reaches 4 and 5; upper Green River = reaches 1, 2, 3, and A; lower Colorado River = reaches 7, <br />8, and B; upper Colorado River = Reach 6. <br />22 <br />