My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9485
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9485
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:27:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9485
Author
McAda, C. W., J. W. Bates, J. S. Cranney, T. E. Chart, M. A. Trammell and W. R. Elblad.
Title
Interagency Standardized Monitoring Program Summary of Results, 1993.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
INTRODUCTION <br />The Interagency Standardized Monitoring Program (ISMP) began in 1986 during the <br />coordination process that ultimately resulted in the Recovery Program for the Endangered Fishes of <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin. ISMP targeted species and reaches where considerable information <br />was already available. As originally designed, ISMP targeted young~f--year (YOY) Colorado <br />squawfish (Ptychocheilus Lucius), subadult and adult Colorado squawfish, and adult humpback chub <br />Gila cypha. However, information on other rare or introduced species was collected when they were <br />encountered. <br />ISMP was developed jointly by representatives from the states of Utah and Colorado, Fish and <br />Wildlife Service (Service), Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau), and Water Development interests <br />composing the Biological Subcommittee of the Upper Colorado River Basin Coordinating Committee. <br />Sampling areas were based on the Sensitive Areas Document (Biological Subcommittee 1984), which <br />summarized river reaches important to the endangered fishes. Designation of these important reaches <br />was based on distribution and abundance data collected by earlier investigators (e.g., Wick et al. <br />1981, 1985a, 1985b, 1986; Tyus et al. 1982, 1987; Valdez et al. 1982; Archer et al. 1985). <br />After the basic framework was developed by the Biological Subcommittee, Feld biologists from <br />the involved agencies developed a detailed sampling protocol. The states of Utah and Colorado were <br />given primary responsibility for sampling reaches within their borders. The Service and Bureau <br />would provide support (equipment and manpower) when necessary. Specific equipment lists, as well <br />as sampling techniques and schedules, were developed to ensure that data collected were comparable <br />among rivers and years. Because consistent data collection over the course of a monitoring program <br />is critical, the Monitoring Program Handbook (USFWS 1987) was developed to document the <br />sampling protocol in considerable detail. The handbook ensures that sampling techniques remain the <br />same even though investigators may change as the program progresses. Standard data forms, <br />encoding instructions, and a database management system were also provided to ISMP participants to <br />facilitate data computerization and analysis (McAda 1987). <br />Data collected during ISMP have been presented in a variety of reports, usually delineated by <br />regional or state boundaries or by species and life history category. An annual summary has been <br />produced each year since the program began (iJSFWS et.al 1987-1991), but data interpretation and <br />discussion have been limited in these summaries. McAda and Kaeding (1989), Osmundson and <br />Kaeding (1991), and Valdez and Cowden (1992, 1993, 1994) summarized various portions of the <br />YOY Colorado squawfish data relative to variation in reproductive success or over-winter survival. <br />In Utah, Bates et al. (1993) presented YOY and subadult-adult Colorado squawfish monitoring data <br />for the lower Green and Colorado rivers through 1990, and Cranney (1990) did the same for the <br />lower White and upper Green rivers. Nester (1992) summarized the same data for the upper <br />Colorado, upper White, and Yampa rivers in Colorado. McAda (1993) summarized the 1989-1991 <br />YOY Colorado squawfish data in relation to backwater number and surface area as measured by <br />aerial video. Most recently, McAda et al. (1994) summarized all data collected during ISMP from <br />1986 through 1992. <br />This annual report presents YOY Colorado squawfish and subadult-adult Colorado squawfish <br />data collected in 1993. It presents some comparisons with previous ISMP data, but data interpretation <br />is limited because of the recent completion of the 1986-1992 summary (McAda et al. 1994). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.