Laserfiche WebLink
m 3o Reach 1 <br />U B24 <br />m 20 F~ <br />O <br />U 10 <br />N ~ n .4 .7 .8 .9 ,4 1 <br />L 0 <br />_N I I I I I I I i <br />LL 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 <br />d <br />30 ~-q Reach 2 <br />O 20 <br /> <br /> 13 <br />C 10 9 <br /> <br />U .4 .1 .1 •1 .8 <br />~ 0 <br /> <br />a. <br />86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 <br />Year <br />30 ~ <br />21 <br />20 <br />10 <br />0 _ <br />Reach 3 <br />.6 ? <br />25 <br />86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 <br />3o Reach 4 <br />20 19 <br />10 7 <br />4 3 3 2 3 4 <br />0 <br />86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 <br />Year <br />Figure 6.-Percentage of the total catch in the first seine haul of primary backwaters comprised of <br />native fishes during fall ISMP sampling in the Green and Colorado rivers, 1986-1993. <br />Although native species increased in abundance, introduced species were still the most common <br />species collected. Three species (fathead minnow Pimephales promelas, red shiner Gyprinella <br />lutrensis, and sand shiner Notropis stramineus) dominated the collections, just as they have since <br />ISMP began. In Reach 4, catch rates for fathead minnow and red shiner increased somewhat (Figure <br />7). However, catch rates for the three species declined or remained fairly steady in the remaining <br />reaches. Nonetheless, these three species composed 75 to 989 of all fishes collected during fall <br />seining (Table A-5). <br />7 <br />