Laserfiche WebLink
.. <br />E 60 <br />., <br />40 <br />c <br />a <br />J 20 <br />v <br />} <br />0 0 <br />~ 60 <br />.. <br />L <br />a~ 40 <br />a~i <br />0 20 <br />0 <br />'- 0 <br />~~~~~~~ <br />86 87 88 89 90 91 92 <br />Reach 2 <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />~~~~~~~ <br />86 87 88 89 90 91 92 <br />~~~~~~2 <br />86 87 88 89 90 91 92 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 <br />Year Year <br />Figure 6.-Median total length (asterisks), central fifty percent of the length-frequency distribution <br />.(cross bars), and minimum and maximum lengths (end bars) of small Colorado squawfish collected <br />during fall monitoring in the Green and Colorado rivers, 1986-1992. The longest length used in <br />these calculations was arbitrarily selected as 70 mm. There was no clear upper length for YOY <br />Colorado squawfish. Relatively few fish longer than 60 mm were collected overall, but fish up to <br />100 mm long were collected in some years (Figure B-4). <br />Table 4.-Correlation (Pearson Correlation Coefficient) of mean total length of YOY Colorado <br />squawfish collected during fall monitoring with accumulated temperature units (sum of the difference <br />[positive values only] between average main channel temperature and 12, 16, and 20°C) for the four <br />reaches sampled during ISMP. Mean total length is presented in Table B-7 and accumulated <br />temperature units are presented in Table B-3. <br /> >12°C >16°C >20°C <br />Reach ra P r P r- P <br />1 .71 .07 .81 .03 .66 .11 <br />2 -.33 .59 -.22 .72 .O1 .99 <br />3 .90 .O1 .90 .O1 .92 .O1 <br />4 .73 .10 .85 .03 .85 .03 <br />'Pearson Correlation Coefficient <br /> <br />