Laserfiche WebLink
Table 2.-Dates when YOY Colorado squawfish monitoring occurred and average of mean-daily <br />river flow (cfs) during the sampling period at USGS gaging stations nearest to the four ISMP <br />sampling reaches. <br /> Colorado River Green River <br /> Reach 1° Reach 2 Reach 3 Reach 4 <br /> Sample Mean Sample Mean Sample Mean Sample Mean <br />Yeaz Dates Flow Dates Flow Dates Flow Dates Flow <br />86 10/3-10/6 8,718 10/1-10/2 7,195 9/29-10/3 4,386 9/29-10/3 3,502 <br />87 9/24-9/27 4,060 9/23-9/24 3,920 9/21-9/23 2,517 9/29-10/2 2,140 <br />88 9/28-10/2 3,428 9/20-9/21 4,000 9/24-9/28 2,046 9/28-10/4 1,264 <br />89 9/24-9/27 3,105 9/19-9/20 2,740 9/20-9/23 1,573 9/27-9/29 1,447 <br />90 9/17-9/20 3,238 9/27-9/28 2,910 9/17-9/20, 1,530 9/24-9/26 1,433 <br />10/15-10/16 <br />91 9/16-9/19 5,030 9/19-9/20 4,995 9/16-9/19 2,660 9/19-9/20, 1,853 <br /> 9/23,9/26 <br />92 9/21-9/29 3,634 9/23-9/25 3,533 9/21-9/24 1,773 9/22-10/7 1,523 <br />°Reach 1 =Colorado River at Cisco, Utah; Reach 2 =Colorado River at Colorado-Utah state line; Reach <br />3 =Green River at Green River, Utah; Reach 4 =Green River at Jensen, Utah. <br />temperatures were typically warmer in the lower reaches of both rivers than in the upper reaches. <br />Although YOY Colorado squawfish spend most of their time in backwaters which usually get warmer <br />than the main channel during the day, main channel temperatures probably give a reasonable <br />approximation of temperatures the fish are exposed to, and allow for comparisons among reaches and <br />years. <br />Distribution and Abundance <br />Gmean CPE for YOY Colorado squawfish was usually higher in Reach 3 of the lower Green <br />River than in the other three reaches (Figure 3; Table B-4). Gmean CPE in Reach 3 was exceeded <br />by another reach on only three occasions: reaches 1 and 4 in 1992, and Reach 4 in 1991. Reach 3 <br />had very high catch rates during the first 4 years of ISMP (1.8 to 5.6 CS/10 m~, but catch rates <br />declined substantially in the last 3 years (0.2 to 0.5 CS/10 m2). The highest catch rate observed in <br />Reach 4 was 1.2 CS/10 m2 in 1988. Gmean CPE in Reach 4 was between 0.1 and 0.8 during other <br />years. The highest catch rate in both Green River reaches occurred in 1988. No other year came <br />close to the high CPE observed in Reach 3 during 1988 (5.6 vs 2.8 CS/10 m2), but Reach 4 had two <br />other years that came reasonably close to the high of 1988 (1.2 vs 0.8 and 0.82 CS/10 m~. <br />The highest catch rates observed in the Colorado River occurred in 1986-Reach 1, 0.8 CS/10 m2 <br />and Reach 2, 0.25 CS/10 m2-the first year of ISMP. Catch rates in both reaches declined steadily <br />after 1986. Very few fish were caught from Reach 2, and it always had the lowest gmean CPE of <br />any reach. Only one Colorado squawfish was caught from this reach in each of the last 5 years. <br />8 <br />