Laserfiche WebLink
Me9e and Vrijenhoek <br />which can be interpreted as the equivalent of one mi- <br />grant between populations per generation. The effective <br />migration rate is much higher along the 10 km portion <br />of Salt Creek inhabited by G bovinu~ being roughly <br />equivalent to an exchange of 17 to 18 individuals be- <br />tween colonies per generation. Values for G pecosensu <br />and C elegans, respectively, are three and two individ- <br />uals per generation. <br />These estimates, however, are sensitive to the under- <br />lying model of population structure (Slatkin 1985). Al- <br />though accurate in a true island situation, they probably <br />underestimate gene flow in a hierazchical situation, and <br />more realistic models of population structure are <br />needed. Even if such models were available, though, it is <br />likely that each dendritic system would have idiosyn- <br />cratic properties that would require simulation to more <br />accurately estimate gene flow. Thus, no single analytical <br />approach would pertain in every case. Nevertheless, a <br />useful rule of thumb is that an exchange of one individ- <br />ual between populations per generation within a river <br />system would maintain most of the allelic diversity, but <br />would not swamp the opportunity for local adaptation <br />(Allendorf 1983). <br />Management of species such as these Cyprinodon <br />should be aimed at preserving the integrity of each spe- <br />cies while maintaining its genetic variability. Movement <br />of fish of the same species among colonies within a river <br />(except, perhaps, for G tularos~ which has the highest <br />D«) would probably pose no specific problems since <br />this appears to occur naturally. However, precautions <br />should be taken to avoid mixing between species. If <br />mixed, it is likely that all four of these Cyprinodon spe- <br />cies could hybridize (see Turner & Liu 1977; Cokendol- <br />pher 1980); introduced Cyprinodon variegates have <br />already hybridized with native C. pecosensu (Echelle, <br />Echelle, & Edds 1987). <br />Into the Future-How Do We Proceed with <br />Management of Southwestern Fishes? <br />The coming decades will present tremendous chal- <br />lenges to the manager of dwindling aquatic resources in <br />the Southwest. Continued population growth in the re- <br />gion will further drain limited natural resources, the <br />spread of exotics will further influence local biota, and <br />the status of native species will certainly continue to <br />decline. However, careful management, based on sound <br />genetic and ecological studies, can slow or reverse these <br />negative trends. One of the more powerful tools in the <br />effort to maintain healthy, diverse populations is the <br />application of genetic principles to management. <br />We particulazly emphasize the need to incorporate <br />experimental studies of population genetics and fitness <br />Conservation Geaeacs of Desert Fishes 165 <br />into management of endangered fishes to better predict <br />the survival and long-term success of remnant popula- <br />tions. Such reseazch would directly benefit the tazget <br />species, and the principles could be applied co manage- <br />ment of other taxa as well. Desert fishes provide oppor- <br />tunities that do not exist with most endangered species. <br />Populations of whooping cranes, cheetahs, or condors <br />cannot be manipulated to determine optimal genetic <br />structure. However, such studies are feasible with many <br />endangered fishes. We thus recommend pursuit of at <br />least three azeas of experimentation that would benefit <br />management of threatened and endangered fishes in the <br />Southwest. <br />1. Test the relationship betu+een heterozygosity and <br />individual fitness Studies with a variety of organisms <br />have resulted in a "heterorygosity concensus," the be- <br />lief that overall fitness is enhanced by genetic diversity <br />(Frankel & Soule 1981; Mitton & Grant 1984). How- <br />ever, we know little of actual mechanisms of heterory- <br />gote superiority, and we do not know whether all <br />species or populations are affected similarly by <br />heterorygosity. Experimental studies of relationships <br />between genetic diversity and growth rates. survivor- <br />slu~ fecundity, developmental stability, and competi- <br />tive ability aze needed to determine the importance of <br />maintaining populations with high heterorygosity. Such <br />stud esi u e currently underway in our laboratories with <br />poeciliid fishes, and early results indicate superior fit- <br />ness of more heterozyttous individuals in some cases: we <br />encourage exploration of such questions in other <br />groups. <br />2. Experimentally mix genetic stocks Although we <br />strongly discourage mixing stocks among major genetic <br />subdivisions, we encourage stocking experiments that <br />combine populations from within the same subdivision. <br />Such experiments would permit evaluation of the ef- <br />fects of mild outcrossing and may prove to be valuable <br />in restocking efforts. For example, in P. occidentalis <br />from Group I in Arizona, Cienega Creek and Monkey <br />Spring fish aze both homorygous for all loci examined <br />(Appendix). Preliminary laboratory results indicate that <br />Monkey Spring fish may grow slower than individuals <br />from the more polymorphic Sharp Spring population <br />(Vrijenhoek & Sadowski, unpublished data): Because <br />they are fixed for alternative alleles at two loci, crosses <br />of Cienega Creek (CC) and Monkey Spring (MS) stocks <br />should increase heterorygosity for these and many <br />other loci. Tests of relative fitness of the CC/MS <br />"hybrids," the parental stocks, and the Sharp Spring <br />stock would indicate how outaossing and concomitant <br />increase in heterorygosity affects fitness. If such exper- <br />imental crosses prove to be more robust than single- <br />locality fish, their use in stocking new field sites should <br />be considered. Existing„natural localities should always <br />remain genetically pure, however. <br />Conservation Biology <br />Volume 2, No. 3, June 1988 <br />