Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />' The Colorado River Basin: The Agreements and the Results <br /> <br /> The Secretary [of the Interior] is directed to proceed as nearly as practicable <br /> with the construction of the ... [Five Fingers) participating Federal <br />reclamation projects concurrently with the construction of the Central <br /> Ariz©na Project, to:the end that such projects shall be completed not Zater <br /> than the date of the first delivery of water from said Central Arizona <br /> Project. as <br />The Actual Results <br />The projects authorized for the benefit of the Lower Division States, from <br />1928 through 1968, as part of legislative deals with the Upper Division States <br />have all been completed. Hoover Dam was completed in the mid-1930s, the <br />All American Canal was finished in 1942, various diversion works and other <br />facilities have been completed on the lower mainstem of the river (e.g., Parker <br />' Dam, Davis Dam, and Senator Wash Dam), and the last major features of the <br />CAP have been completed within the past few years. <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />u <br />1 <br /> <br />t <br /> <br /> <br />To be sure, the CAP that has been built is significantly different in certain <br />regards than the CAP that was authorized in 1968: some originally <br />authorized features of the project were deleted, Congress has required that <br />significant non-federal cost sharing be provided toward the completion of <br />construction, and portions of the project's water supply have been allocated to <br />other than the originally contemplated irrigation beneficiaries.ss However, <br />the CAP, even though altered, is physically capable of delivering a little more <br />than 2 million acre-feet per year to Arizona from the Colorado Rivers', as it <br />was originally contemplated it would do. <br />In short, the Lower Division States have, for the most part, gotten that for <br />which they bargained. Indeed, within just the past few years, Arizona, <br />~ Colorado River Basin Project Act, Pub. L. No. 90-537, § 501(b), 82 Stat. 897 (1968) <br />(codified at 43 U.S.C.A. § 620a-1(1986)). <br />~ See H. INGRAM, supra note 3, at 123-127. <br />87 Full use of the CAP's pumping capacity would require substantial purchases of <br />electrical energy beyond that which is available to the project under favorable terms from the <br />federally owned share of the Navajo Generating Station, acoal-fired plant in Arizona. This <br />fact, when coupled with the economic constraints which the CAP irrigation districts presently <br />face, makes it likely, in the author's opinion, that annual CAP deliveries will not exceed about <br />1.5 million acre-feet for some time to come. Deliveries in 1996 reached nearly 1.2 million acre- <br />feet and are expected to be about the same in 1997. Personal communication from Tom <br />Burbey, Lower Colorado Region, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, to the author (April 29, 1997). <br />27 <br />