8014 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 1 The Colorado River Basin: The Agreemenu and the Resulu irrigators to repay. This repayment mechanism, which is known as the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund, was established by section 5 of the Colorado River Storage Project Act.73 Meanwhile, Arizona, having ratified the Colorado River Compact in 1944, started working with Reclamation to capture a federal reclamation prize for itself -- the Central Arizona Project (CAP). A 1947 report by Reclamation had resurrected this dormant idea and endorsed it as now being economically justified. However, 1 ... When Arizonans introduced a bill in Congress [in 1948) to authorize the CAP, they encountered stiff opposition from Californians who argued that Arizona was attempting to use water that did not belong to the state. ... [D]issension centered on conflicting interpretations of the 1922 [Colorado River) compact. The differing claims caused Congress to refuse approval of ' the CAP until the two states had resolved their differences. Congress did not want to invest in a project for which there might be not water. The news bitterly disappointed Arizonans. While the Upper Basin, California, and Mexico were moving ahead with their projects, Arizonans had remained stymied. They believed their only recourse was to appeal once more to the U.S. Supreme Court.74 Arizona filed its fourth lawsuit against California in the U.S. Supreme Court in 1952, again seeking judicial apportionment of the Colorado River Compact's allocation to the Lower Basin. While the Court had refused Arizona's earlier suit in this regard on jurisdictional grounds and because the Lower Basin allocation exceeded then current uses,75 this time the Court was persuaded that Arizona might suffer harm if the dispute with California were not resolved. In defending against Arizona's suit, California argued for substantially more than the 4.4 million acre-feet per year provided to it by the Boulder Canyon Project Act. However, after 11 years of trial and arguments, Arizona emerged 73 Colorado River Storage Project Act, ch. 203, § 5, 70 Stat. 107 (1956) (codified as amended at 43 U.S.C.A. § 620d (1986)). 74 Hundley, supm note 34, at 30-31. 75 Arizona v. California, 298 U.S. 558 (1936). 23