My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8014
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:24:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8014
Author
McDonald, W. J.
Title
The Upper Basins' Political Conundrum
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
A Deal is Not a Deal.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1 The Colorado River Basin: The Agreements and the Results <br /> Federal involvement in flood control im rovements likewise dates back well <br />P <br /> into the 1800s, again through the Corps of Engineers. Improvements initially <br />were limited to dikes, levees, cutoffs, and other manipulations of a river <br /> channel's configuration. Authorization of fede"rally financed reservoir projects <br /> for flood control purposes followed around the turn of the century. <br /> Originally, the costs of constructing and maintaining flood control facilities <br /> were, as with navigation projects, borne entirely by the United States, with no <br /> repayment required from those protected by such facilities. Congress changed <br /> this policy in 1936, when it enacted legislation requiring states or their <br /> political subdivisions, at their expense, to: (a) provide all lands, easements, <br /> and rights-of--way required for a flood control project, and (b) operate and <br /> maintain facilities after they had been constructed.31 <br /> If flood control is incor orated into a multipurpose Corps of Engineers` <br />P <br /> reservoir project (e.g., a project for power generation and flood control), then <br /> the joint costs of multipurpose project features are allocated among the <br /> various purposes, with the flood control purpose being non-reimbursable. If <br /> recreation or fish and wildlife purposes are included with a Corps of <br /> Engineers' flood control project, then the construction and O&M costs <br /> allocable to these purposes are subject to the same arrangements as discussed <br /> above for the federal reclamation program.sz <br /> In short, federal navigation and flood control projects, as with the federal <br /> reclamation program, presented an attractive subsidy. This too helped set the <br /> stage for conflicts between upper and lower basins as each sought a slice of <br /> the federal water development project pie. <br /> <br /> The Colorado River Basin: The Agreements and the Results <br /> Introduction <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The Colorado River and its major tributaries rise in the Rocky Mountains in <br />Colorado and Wyoming. Its drainage basin encompasses portions of those two <br />states, as well as portions of California, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah, and <br />essentially all of Arizona. Except in the mountains which ring the <br />31 Flood Control Act of 1936, ch. 688, § 3, 49 Stat. 1571 (codified at 33 U.S.C.A. § 701c <br />(1986)). <br />~ Federal Water Project Recreation Act, 16 U.S.C. §4601-13 (1993). <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.