My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8014
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:24:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8014
Author
McDonald, W. J.
Title
The Upper Basins' Political Conundrum
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
A Deal is Not a Deal.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Upper Basins' Political Conundrum: A Deal is Not a Deal <br />snowmelt, not rainfall, and therefore receive most of their total annual <br />runoff in only a three or four month period from April through July.4 <br />As a consequence of these conditions, intensive agriculture usually cannot be <br />sustained without the benefit of extensive irrigation. Also, in order to have <br />reliable, year-round and year-to-year water supplies, reservoirs are needed to <br />store peak flows for later distribution in the low runoff months and drier <br />years. <br />These physical circumstances have led to the development of legal and <br />institutional systems for defining rights in and to the use of water that are <br />unique to the West. These are very briefly outlined below. <br />Western Water Law <br />In the East, South, and Midwest, where rainfall is generally sufficient for <br />growing crops and where stream flows are sustained by rainfall on a <br />relatively uniform basis, states adopted the English common law riparian <br />doctrine. Under the riparian system, only those who own land bordering a <br />river are entitled to make "reasonable use" of the water of that river on the <br />same land, and only then if their use does not interfere with "reasonable uses" <br />by others who also own land adjacent to the same river (be they upstream of <br />or downstream from the specified riparian user). "Reasonable use" is typically <br />not quantified.5 <br />Given the relative scarcity of rainfall in the West, and the variability of runoff <br />within a year and from year to year, the western states developed a different <br />legal system for allocating water supplies. It is known as the doctrine of prior <br />appropriation. The doctrine initially developed as the custom of the <br />' The major exceptions are the coastal rivers in California, Oregon, and Washington and <br />the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers in the Central Valley of California, where winter <br />rainfall accounts for a large percentage of annual stream flows, with peak flows occurring in <br />December, January, and February. The Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers are also fed by <br />snowmelt runoff from the Sierra Nevada and thus typically experience a second peak of runoff <br />in the April through June timeframe. <br />s For a general description of the riparian doctrine, see D. GETCHES, WATER LAW IN A <br />NUTSHELL 15-73 (3d ed. 1997). <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.