Laserfiche WebLink
` REPORT OF THE HIOTECHNICAL StJBCaMMITTEE <br />Introduction and Overview <br />The Hiotechnical Subcommittee, and interagency working group, was organized in <br />May 1984. Its task was to determine the habitat requirements of the endangered <br />Colorado River fishes--those habitat characteristics that are essential to the <br />survival of these species. During the past several months, the subcommittee <br />has been cooperating with the Fish and Wildlife Service in the development of a <br />complex computer model of the habitat of the Upper Colorado River Hasin <br />endangered fishes. The model consists of several components--actually <br />individual models that are interfaced with one another and thereby function to <br />predict the availability of habitat for endangered Colorado River fishes under <br />past, present, and possible future conditions of water development in the <br />basin. Component models include a hydraulic model tHYDROSS) that predicts <br />discharge conditions under various potential water-development scenarios, a <br />temperature model that predicts river temperatures under these scenarios+ and a <br />physical habitat simulation model (PHAHSIM) that uses outputs from the previous <br />models to predict the availability of habitat for endangered fishes. The <br />predictive ability of the habitat simulation model is therefore directly <br />related to the predictive ability taccuraty) of the hydrology and temperature <br />models. <br />In January 1985 the Hiotechnical Committee was given the responsibility of <br />critically analyzing the PHAHSIM model relative to the model's ability to <br />predict flow-related changes in habitat for the endangered Colorado River <br />fishes. The specific objectives of this analysis as established by the <br />committee, were as follows: i) to identify the "data gaps" (major <br />deficiencies) evident in the modeling effort; 2) to identify approaches to <br />testing/validating the model; 3) to identify data/research needs; 4) short-term <br />implementation of ESA Section F; 5) luny-term implementation of ESA Section F; <br />6) Conservation funding; and 7) future Biological Sub-committee activities. <br />This document describes the results of that analysis. <br />Major Deficiencies <br />ADDITIONAL CONCERN 5. The interagency effort has resulted in the development <br />of a flaw/habitat model; however, there are other important environmental <br />parameters that--although not flow-related (e. g.+ cantaminants+ competitive <br />spp,, movement barriers)--might have important effects on endangered fishes. <br />These factors must be included or assessed if they are found to be important to <br />the maintenance and development of populations of endangered fishes. <br />RECOMMENDATION: Testing/validation of the modelfrequires testing of the <br />following hypothesis: Nanflaw-related characteristics of the environment have <br />important effects on the populations of endangered Cnlorado River fishes. <br />RECOMMENDATION: Data/research needed to test the above hypothesis include the <br />following: <br />i <br />