My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9552
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9552
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:09:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9552
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Management Plan for the Big-River Fishes of the Lower Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
amendment and supplement to the Bonytail, Humpback chub, Colorado pikeminnow, and Razorback sucker Recovery Plans.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />System or National Wildlife Refuge System are excluded from the <br />' requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act. For such species, Federal <br />agencies would only be required to informally confer with the Service, as <br />delineated in section 7(a)(4). The 10(j) status for Colorado pikeminnow <br />' extends from Roosevelt Dam upstream in the Salt River and from <br />Horseshoe Dam upstream to Perkinsville in the Verde River. Restoration <br />of the Colorado pikeminnow to the Lake Mohave subunit in the fu#ure can <br />' be accomplished, but will require addressing specific concerns of Arizona <br />and Nevada. These concerns and issues are identified below. <br />' In Arizona, AGFD proposed 10(j) populations of Colorado pikeminnow for <br /> the lower basin in the past Future proposals would require AGFD to <br /> complete an Arizona Game and Fish Commission-approved 12-step <br />' process for developing and approving reestablishment proposals for <br /> nongame and endangered wildlife. In addition to biological, feasibility, <br /> and financial issues, principal concerns with proposals to repatriate this <br />' species to the lower river would likely focus on effects to cities, <br /> communities, and affected interests along or served by the River. The <br /> Department has not given a position on repatriation of the Colorado <br />' pikeminnow in the Colorado River mainstem, but it already manages 10(j) <br /> repatriation efforts for the species in Central Arizona. In addition to the <br /> 12-step process, any repatriation proposal or implementation effort in <br />' Arizona would be guided by recovery objectives and objective scientific <br /> evaluation of opportunities to achieve recovery objectives. Collaborative <br /> state-federal development of a 4(d) rule would allow states to address <br />' incidental take or eventual management of repatriated populations as a <br /> sports fishery. <br />' In Nevada, Colorado pikeminnow is classified as "Protected Endangered" <br /> under NAC 503.065 (2)(a). Because Colorado pikeminnow may be at <br /> substantially higher risk of incidental take by sport anglers than other "big- <br />" <br />' ~ river <br />fishes, a 10Q) designation for pikeminnow released into areas of the <br /> lower Colorado River mainstem is necessary. As an alternative strategy, <br /> <br />' range wide downlisting to threatened status based on positive progress <br />and recovery in the upper basin, could be combined with a 4(d) rule that <br /> would allow states to address possible incidental take by anglers. <br />' Reclassification under NAC to allow sport harvest or catch-and release <br />angling for Colorado pikeminnow, if the species were to be downlisted to <br /> threatened with appropriate 4(d) rule implementation, would require the <br />a <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.