My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9552
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9552
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:09:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9552
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Management Plan for the Big-River Fishes of the Lower Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
amendment and supplement to the Bonytail, Humpback chub, Colorado pikeminnow, and Razorback sucker Recovery Plans.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~ <br /> : <br />' t <br /> <br /> naturally. Once progeny have reached suitable size for release, they will be <br /> marked and released to the adjacent mainstem adult population. The amount of <br />' genetic variability conserved by this technique is limited by the number of <br /> breeding adults, which in turn is limited by the acreage of available habitat. The <br /> same adults should not be used repeatedly for this purpose. <br /> 3. Utilize hatchery propagation based on a broodstock. Broodstock used in <br />' hatchery propagation should include the maximum number of wild fish possible. <br /> Strict breeding pedigrees should be followed to minimize inbreeding and at the <br /> same time pass on a maximum diversity of alleles to F2 progeny. Genetic <br /> variability passed on from agiven-sized broodstock is governed by: <br /> a. measured contributions of gametes from individuals with known genetic <br /> attributes; or <br />' b. a statistical breeding regime based on the probabilities that each allele <br /> present in the broodstock is present in their progeny. <br />' 4. Use wild adults from Lake Mohave as broodstock. Once spawned, each. wild <br /> adult would be PIT tagged and returned to Lake Mohave, using each adult only <br /> <br />t once. <br /> Of these strategies, the first one is preferred as it maintains the highest genetic <br /> variability in these fish by potentially using the maximum number of wild fish. <br />' Regardless of the mating strategy applied, the only genetic variation that can be <br /> passed on to the progeny in a hatchery setting is that of the original broodstock <br /> (Minckiey et al. 2003). If the complete component of genetic variance is not <br />' captured in the broodstock, genetic variation will be diminished and less new <br /> variation generated. The potential for reduced fitness due to fixation of <br /> detrimental alleles may be increased. Such reductions in fitness when the <br />' number of contributing individuals declines appear to be a particularly severe <br /> problem in species with large ancestral populations and consequently high <br /> historical genetic loads (Hedrick and Kalinowski 2000). Management to maintain <br />genetic variance should be under the most natural conditions possible, <br /> emphasizing achievement and maintenance of the species' carrying capacities in <br /> <br />' diverse habitats. The end result should be increasing opportunities for <br />emergence of novel variation <br />thus maximizing adaptive potentials <br /> . <br />, <br /> CONDITIONING METHODS <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.