Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />ii <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />BIG-RIVER FISHES <br />The "big-river" fishes are characterized by endemism and unique adaptations to <br />this harsh environment and display remarkable physiological, morphological, and <br />behavioral traits. Today the remaining populations of these species are small <br />and isolated. The disappearance of native fishes in the lower basin has <br />attracted attention since early days of river modification (Dill 1944; Miller 1946, <br />1961). Two inter-related actions- are primarily responsible for the elimination of <br />the "big-river" fish. One is the alteration of habitat due to dam construction and <br />diversions and the other is the introduction of nonnative fish. Dams and <br />permanent diversion structures interrupted the seasonal flow patterns, replacing <br />them with managed flows, and also altered thermal regimes in reservoir <br />impoundments and the remaining river channel. Sediment transport was <br />interrupted, causing changes to channel morphology and dynamics. Dams also <br />blocked migration routes and isolated groups offish. The meandering of the <br />river within its historic floodplain, which had created backwaters and marshes., <br />was halted, and the floodplain was isolated behind levees or stabilized banks. <br />Some habitats suitable for adult fish persistence still remain throughout the <br />system but the low variance in flows and thus seasonal conditions critical for key <br />life stages of native fish in the presence of nonnative predators and competitors, <br />are greatly reduced. <br />Concurrently, the introduction and spread of nonnative fishes may have been <br />even more detrimental than loss of habitat. The new physical conditions in the <br />lower basin provided suitable habitat for these introduced species and they <br />spread rapidly. Most nonnatives are ecological generalists and are very <br />competitive.with other fish species. Many are predators, or if omnivorous, are <br />still a threat to native fish eggs and young. Decades of monitoring and research <br />in the lower basin have shown that nonnative predators or competitors prevent <br />native fish populations from completing their life cycle in the few suitable habitat <br />patches remaining (Blinn et al. 1993, Minckley and Deacon 1968, 1991; Minckley <br />1973, 1985, 1991; Pacey and Marsh 2000). These nonnative species now <br />dominate the aquatic habitats available in the lower basin. <br />Bon ail <br />3 <br /> <br />