My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9660
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9660
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:08:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9660
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Colorado Squawfish Revised Recovery Plan - Draft.
USFW Year
1990.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
D-RAFT <br />Loss of fish habitat and habitat fragmentation due to stream blockage could <br />pose a threat to the recovery effort and has been implicated in the systematic <br />loss of the fish. Sheldon (1988,) found that alterations of river drainages by <br />fragmentation leads~to a reduction of species diversity and pecies <br />extinction. In the upper Colorado River, blockage of the Gunnison and upper <br />mainstream by diversion dams have no doubt restricted access of-the fish to <br />presumed habitats (Valdez et al. 1982). Construction of Flaming Gorge Dam <br />buried inundated spawning habitats and blocked upstream passage. Construction <br />of Taylor Draw -Dam on the White River has blocked the movement of upstream, <br />return migrants (Martinez 1986a) and resulted in a loss of about 80 km <br />(50 miles) of adult habitat from which mature fish contributed to the spawning <br />aggregations in both Gray and Yampa canyons (Tyus et al-. 1981). Fragmentation <br />of the rivers in the Lower Basin undoubtedly restricted movement over much of <br />the historic range of the Colorado squawfish. <br />In September 1962, the area of the Green River now impounded by Flaming. Gorge <br />Dam was treated with rotenone in order to establish more favorable conditions <br />for game fish species. This poisoning effectively eliminated Colorado <br />squawfish in the reservoir basin, and an accident occurred in which a small <br />proportion of the toxic substance apparently travelled downstream past a <br />detoxification station to the vicinity of Dinosaur National Monument. Banks <br />(1964) noted a significant reduction in the number of species captured at four <br />stations within the Monument shortly after the accidedtal treatment. The <br />greatest reduction appeared to occur at the Gates of Lodore in the northern, <br />and most upstream, portion of the Monument, while the least impact was noted <br />at a downstream site. However, Binns et al. (1963) concluded that little <br />long-term impact to the fish species composition had resulted from the <br />treatment. <br />Colorado squawfish have disappeared from areas upstream of reservoirs (e.g., <br />Salt River above Roosevelt Lake, Arizona; Green River-above Fontenelle and <br />Flaming Gorge dams, Wyoming; San Juan River above Navajo Reservoir, New <br />Mexico) and in reaches that appear little changed from predevelopment <br />conditions. Reasons for these disappearances or declines are not fully <br />understood, but probably involve subtle changes in habitat, competition and <br />predation from introduced species, blockage of spawning migrations, lack of <br />suitable spawning habitat, post-dam eradication programs, and/or loss of adult <br />fish from angling. In summary, the absolute cause for the decline of Colorado <br />squawfish is~not fully understood but is probably re]ated to a combination of <br />factors, including direct loss of habitat, changes in flow and temperature, <br />blockage of migration routes, and interactions with introduced fish species. <br />Sensitive Areas and Priority Recovery Areas <br />Sensitive Areas <br />The Biological Subcommittee of the Upper Colorado River Coordinating Committee <br />developed criteria and prepared a list of sensitive areas depicting the <br />location of important spawning, nursery, juvenile, and adult habitats, both <br />past and present, in the Upper Basin (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1987) <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.