My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9629
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9629
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:07:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9629
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Selected NEPA Documents.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
30 <br />agencies. The clearinghouses may be used, by mutual agreement of the lead agency and the <br />clearinghouse, for securing State and local reviews of the draft environmental impact state- <br />ments. <br />(3) Request comments from the applicant, if any. <br />(4) Request comments from the public, affirmatively soliciting comments from those <br />persons or organizations who may be interested or affected. <br />(b) An agency may request comments on a fmal environmental impact statement before <br />the decision is finally made. In any case other agencies or persons may make comments <br />before the fmal decision unless a different time is provided under SS 1506.10. <br />1503.2 Duty to comment. <br />Federal agencies with jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to any <br />environmental impact involved and agencies which are authorized to develop and enforce <br />environmental standards shall comment on statements within their jurisdiction, expertise, or <br />authority. Agencies shall comment within the time period specified for comment in SS <br />1506.10. A Federal agency may reply that it has no comment. If a cooperating agency is <br />satisfied that its views are adequately reflected in the environmental impact statement, it <br />should reply that it has no comment. <br />1503.3 Specificity of comments. <br />(a) Comments on an environmental impact statement or on a proposed action shall be as <br />specific as possible and may address either the adequacy of the statement or the merits of the <br />alternatives discussed or both. <br />(b) When a commenting agency criticizes a lead agency's predictive methodology, the <br />commenting agency should describe the alternative methodology which it prefers and why. <br />(c) A cooperating agency shall specify in its comments whether it needs additional <br />information to fulfill other applicable environmental reviews or consultation requirements <br />and what information it needs. In particular, it shall specify any additional information it <br />needs to comment adequately on the draft statement's analysis of significant site specific <br />effects associated with the granting or approving by that cooperating agency of necessary <br />Federal permits, licenses, or entitlements. <br />(d) When a cooperating agency with jurisdiction by law objects to or expresses <br />reservations about the proposal on grounds of environmental impacts, the agency expressing <br />the objection or reservation shall specify the mitigation measures it considers necessary to <br />allow the agency to grant or approve applicable permit, license, or related requirements or <br />concurrences. <br />1503.4 Response to comments. <br />(a) An agency preparing a final environmental impact statement shall assess and consider <br />comments both individually and collectively, and shall respond by one or more of the means <br />listed below, stating its response in the final statement. Possible responses are to: <br />(1) Modify alternatives including the proposed action. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.