Laserfiche WebLink
on March 2, 1988 at a discharge of 340 cfs (9.6 cros). On Apri16, just after ice-out, an average daily <br />discharge of 1,450 cfs (41.1 cros) resulted in the same stage elevation of 92.14 feet. <br />Ice Conditions <br />Surface ice covered the Yampa River from December through early March in both winters <br />investigated. Ice cover in large streams, like the Yampa River, is normally in floatation (Rantz 1982). <br />As stage increases or ice thickens, increased upward force by the water causes tension, or coastal, <br />cracks in the ice, usually near the banks. The ice Iloats to a position of equilibrium, and water fills <br />the tension cracks and refreezes to form a solid ice cover. This same phenomenon occurs with a drop <br />in stage, where weight of the unsupported ice causes stress cracks along the banks and the ice falls <br />to an equilibrium position with the water. Under extremely cold conditions, heavy surface ice in <br />contact with the stream may resist this state of equilibrium, causing flow conditions to more closely <br />resemble a closed conduit. In mid-February, small increases in discharge (197 to 229 cfs; 5.6 to 6.5 <br />cros) of the Yampa River were not sufficient to raise the level of the ice. The cross sectional area <br />remained fixed, like a closed conduit, resulting in an increase in water velocity. <br />Just as the process of ice formation throughout winter effectively increased stage at a given <br />discharge on the Yampa River, spring breakup had the opposite effect. In cross sectional <br />measurements taken March 3 and 15, 1988, a 10 cfs decrease in discharge resulted in a stage <br />reduction of 0.4 feet (12.2 cm). This was caused by warm air temperatures in March, and loss of <br />shoreline ice at anchor points. This resulted in an increase in water flowing along the river's edge, <br />loss of the damming effect of the shore ice, and reduction of stage at a given flow. <br />Spring breakup was a critical period for fish in the Yampa River, as low-velocity habitats <br />became invaded by flowing water. Bed changes also occurred as sediment moved with shifting <br />currents. The Yampa River fish were noticeably more active during spring breakup, also described <br />by Wick and Hawkins (1989) as a violent event. Large slabs of ice tilted and scraped along the river <br />bottom, leaving dramatic changes in the channel bed, such that a backwater at RM 95.7, was nearly <br />tilled with large amounts of gravel. Three radiotagged Colorado squawfish that had occupied this <br />backwater throughout winter, moved to another downstream location. In contrast, radiotagged fish <br />using an embayment at RM 81.1 remained in place, as very little ice was deposited and no changes <br />were seen in the embayment during breakup. <br />Movement And Habitat Of Radiotagged Adults <br />Ten adult Colorado squawfish were radiotagged in each of two subsequent winters in the <br />Green and Yampa rivers, to monitor movement, local activity, habitat use, and response to changing <br />20 <br />