Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Representatives of non-Federal water resource development organizations also <br />' participated in this process. The water resource organizations participated <br />in a search for a practical and meaningful program to manage and recover these <br />fish species in a manner that does not disrupt State water rights systems, <br />interstate compacts, and court decrees that allocate rights to use Colorado <br />River water among the States. <br />In addition, a number of national and Statewide conservation organizations <br />participated in this process. The conservation organizations were interested <br />both in assuring preservation of the rare and endangered fish species and <br />their habitat and assuring that a realistic recovery program would be <br />' implemented in an effective and prompt manner. <br />Each of these interests participated extensively in the drafting of this <br />program. Each is committed to the successful implementation of a recovery <br />program that will provide for recovery of the endangered fish species, <br />consistent with Federal law and all applicable State laws and systems for <br />water resource development and use. <br />' 1.2 BACKGROUND <br />Three fish species that inhabit the Colorado River have been federally listed <br />as endangered: the Colorado squawfish, the bonytail chub, and the humpback <br />chub. The razorback sucker is not listed at this time but has been identified <br />by the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) as a candidate for listing. For <br />the purposes of simplifying references, all four species are collectively <br />referred to as rare in this document, and measures to manage the razorback <br />sucker are described generically as conservation or recovery activities. <br />While each of the four species was once abundant in the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin (see Map 1-2), they have been declining in number and are threatened <br />with extinction from their natural habitat (see Map 1-3). A number of factors <br />account for the current status of these species, ranging from habitat <br />reduction or alteration to introduction of nonnative species (see <br />Appendix 6.1). The Fish and Wildlife Service has maintained since 1978 that a <br />jeopardy situation exists because of habitat loss and other factors and <br />because of the declining numbers of the endangered fish due to these factors. <br />It has concluded that actions must be taken to offset these factors. The <br />Service has described this conclusion through Section 7 of the Endangered <br />Species Act in over 100 biological opinions on project impacts on the <br />endangered fishes in the upper basin. <br />Protection and recovery of these species to offset some of these factors will <br />require resolution of a broad set of potentially difficult issues. First, <br />these fish species are found in two States in the upper basin (Colorado and <br />Utah), and at least one, the Colorado squawfish, is migratory. Second, <br />protection of these species' habitat necessitates maintenance of some level of <br />instream flows, yet the relationship between State water rights systems and <br />Federal responsibilities in this area is a sensitive one. Finally, improving <br />the status of these rare fish will require an increase in population abundance <br />and survival, and improvement and maintenance of sufficient habitat to support <br />all four species. <br /> <br />1 1-3