Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table ES-1 (Continued) <br />Impact Findings of Environmental Assessment <br />Executive Sunnaryl/ <br />Impacts of the <br />Potentially Affected Resource Impacts of the Proposed Action "No Action" Alternative <br />2. Natural riparian-wetland The assumed flow changes are expected to have Similar to Proposed Action. <br />habitat only minor, redistributional effects on exist- <br />ing riparian-wetland habitat. <br />3. Irrigation-associated There is a possibility that sane agricultural Agricultural wetlands may not be lost'as a re- <br />riparian habitat wetlands might be lost if water for instream sult of rare fish conservation efforts, but could <br />flows is purchased from farmers. However, be lost anyway if fanners decide to sell water for <br />these potential losses could be offset by municipal and irrigation uses. <br />downstream benefits from water purchases <br />or improvement of other wetlands. <br />4. Terrestrial wildlife No significant impacts to stream-associated Similar to Proposed Action. <br />N wildlife species are anticipated fran assumed <br />flow changes. <br />V <br />F. Other Endangered and Threatened <br />Species <br />G. Candidate Species <br />H. Recreational Boating <br />No significant impacts are anticipated to <br />other listed species (Table III-F-1) from <br />the assumed flow changes. Site-specific <br />actions which might adversely impact other <br />listed species would be preceded by <br />Section 7 consultation to avoid or minimize <br />any adverse impacts. <br />No significant impacts are anticipated. <br />Ruedi: Increased probability that two <br />reservoir boat ramps will be unusable in <br />July (2 percent) and August (8 percent). <br />Same as Proposed Action. <br />Same as Proposed Action. <br />Ruedi: Same as Proposed Action. <br />m <br />x <br />m <br />n <br />c <br />C <br />m <br />c <br />3 <br />3 <br />-G