My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6028
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
6028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:56:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
6028
Author
Wick, E. J., D. L. Stoneburner and J. A. Hawkins.
Title
Observations on the Ecology of Colorado Squawfish (
USFW Year
1983.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
INTRODUCTION <br />The Yampa River originates on the western slope of the Rocky <br />Mountains near Yampa, Colorado. It is the largest tributary to the • <br />Green River. The Yampa flows first in a northerly and then in a <br />westerly direction to its confluence with the Green River in Dinosaur <br />National Monument (Fig. 1). The Yampa River can be characterized as a <br />system of extreme hydrologic events. Dramatic seasonal fluctuations in <br />flow create equally dramatic changes in temperature, turbidity, <br />conductivity, and quantity of allochthonous material. These seasonal <br />variations in flow and water quality also exhibit long-term pulses <br />caused by annual variations in precipitation and accumulation of snow in <br />mountainous regions of the river watershed. Amid these hydrologic <br />extremes the endemic Colorado squawfish evolved a unique migratory <br />reproductive strategy. <br />Historically, migration of Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus <br />lucius) was considered a predictable summer event in many of the rivers <br />of western Colorado (Sigler and Miller, 1963; Joseph et al., 1977; <br />Behnke and Benson, 1980). However, neither origin nor destination of <br />the migrants was documented. It was assumed that the migration was <br />related to spawning. <br />Recent studies, conducted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />(USFWS), Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW), and Utah Division of <br />Wildlife Resources in the Upper Colorado River basin (Wick et al., 1981; <br />e <br />Haynes and Muth, 1982; Miller et al., 1982a,b, 1983b; Tyus et al., <br />1982a,b; Radant et al., 1983) produced new data regarding the movements <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.