My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9314 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9314 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:55:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9314
Author
Wick, E. J. and J. A. Hawkins.
Title
Colorado Squawfish Winter Habitat Study.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />they did not need to leave it often. Fish remained within this backwater <br />during the entire winter and left it only a few times for only brief periods. <br />Most embayment use was at RMI 81.1. This embayment remained relatively <br />unchanged after ice-off and spring runoff. In addition to this embayment, one <br />at R G 71.6 was used in Winter 2 and another at Goverrnnent Bridge (R G 98.8) <br />was used early in both years. Fish used embayments throughout the winter, but <br />they would occasionally leave to use run and other associated main-channel <br />habitat. <br />All pool habitat use was within a mile section at the Lily Park study <br />site, a river segment characterized by eddy and pool habitat. This area has <br />no backwater and very little embayment habitat available during law flaw, <br />winter conditions. All three fish (C87, C89, and C00) in this area used pool <br />and occasionally run and/or eddy habitat during the winter. <br />In areas where a variety of habitats was available, fish appeared to <br />select certain habitat types over others. There was pool habitat within 0.3 <br />mile of both the backwater (RMI 95.7) and the embayments (RMI 98.8, 81.1 and <br />76.2,) but no fish were observed to use these during the winter. <br />Fish using main-channel habitats changed habitat more frequently than <br />fish using off-channel habitats. Main-channel habitats may not provide as <br />many of a fish's winter needs. Advantages to the use of off-channel <br />(backwater and embayment) habitats may include: <br />1) low or zero velocity for energy conservation, <br />2) increased concentration of food, <br />3) easier identification of hoarse range area through <br />consistent visual or olfactory cues, and <br />4) protection from moving frazil ice <br />Off-channel habitats may also provide other indirect benefits, e.g., <br />increased oxygen and primary productivity. The lower flaws present during <br />Winter 2 either made these off-channel habitats less suitable or made main- <br />channel habitats more acceptable. <br />Squawfish evolved within a system that provided variability of flaws <br />between years. Natural yearly variability would be important to avoid food <br />supply depletion during low-flow periods that would tend to concentrate prey <br />within the main channel where less cover may be available. If law flaws <br />continued over several years, populations of prey species could be reduced <br />since they would be subject to increased predation by the squawfish and <br />introduced northern pike and have fewer highly productive feeding areas <br />available during the winter. <br />Predominant habitat used in the fall, 1987, was pool; followed by run, <br />shoreline, and eddy. Backwater and embayment habitats were used the least in <br />contrast to high use of these habitats during the winter. Most pool use was <br />within the Lily Park study Area where this habitat dominates over other types. <br />Habitats used in the fall within the Maybell area were equally distributed <br />among almost all habitat types (Figure 9). <br />In the spring, eddy was the predominant habitat used followed by <br />backwater and shoreline (Figure 10). &bayments were not used during this <br />period probably since they tended to be flooded by the high flows. Run and <br />pool habitats were used very little. Backwater habitat was used in all three <br />study areas. <br />24 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1-7 <br />L <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />1 <br />11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.