My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9314 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9314 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:55:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9314
Author
Wick, E. J. and J. A. Hawkins.
Title
Colorado Squawfish Winter Habitat Study.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />STUDY AREA <br />Site selection <br />This study was conducted on the Yampa River from Lily Park, river mile <br />(R-11) 51, to Morgan Gulch, RMI 105 (Figure 1). River segments selected for <br />radiotagging squawfish were based on existing Instream Flow Incremental <br />Methodology (IFIM) sites established by USFWS. These sites were located at <br />Lily Park RMI 53.2, Maybell RU 72, and Government Bridge RMI 97.2. Because <br />initial radiotag implantation efforts at Lily Park were unsuccessful, fish <br />were implanted only at Government Bridge (RMI 105-95) and Maybell (RMI 82-70) <br />in the first year of the study. Lily Park (F44I 54-51) was successfully added <br />to the study areas during Winter 2. <br />Description of study areas <br />Government ad!j Le (MI 105-951 <br />A predominant habitat type of this river reach during the base flaw <br />period is eddy, mostly associated with man-made rock jetties. Because of <br />heavy agricultural activity in this reach involving irrigation, rock <br />stabilization of banks and irrigation structures are common. A unique habitat <br />resulting from this activity was a large, 50x100 meter (m) backwater located <br />at RNII 95.7 (Figure 2). Backwaters of this size and structure are not ccumon <br />habitat features on the Yampa River during the base-flaw period. This <br />backwater is relatively new, resulting from 1984 flood waters which eroded the <br />river bank around car bodies and boulders placed along the river bank. Abet <br />100 m of dirt bank and alfalfa field were eroded away, resulting in extensive <br />gravel bar deposition and a wide, braided channel. Another predominant <br />habitat type of this reach is long, slowmoving run habitat. It is difficult <br />to accurately identify this habitat because at first appearance the long, law <br />velocity habitats appear to be pools. But they lack sufficient depth and <br />reduction in velocity relative to the main current to warrant the classic pool <br />definition (Appendix A). At extremely low winter flows, these shallow (2-5 <br />foot deep) runs contain a large volume of law velocity habitat and could be <br />called shallow pools. However, because of the ice cover, it was difficult to <br />make these determinations and we tended to define run habitat based'on channel <br />characteristics during open water. combed to other study areas, this river <br />reach was most impacted by man. Deep pool habitat was not cannon, although a <br />large, deep naturally occurring eddy and pool combination is located just <br />below a high gradient reach at RMI 99. This river reach contains several <br />backwaters which form as a result of high flaws during spring runoff. These <br />high-flaw backwaters (dammed side channels, flooded tributary streams, and <br />irrigation returns) are used frequently by squawfish (Wick et al. 1986). <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.