Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br />SLHAARY <br />Radiotracking of adult Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius) was <br />conducted on the upper Yampa River, Colorado, over two winters (Decker 1986- <br />March 1988) under conditions historically found in the upper portions of the <br />Colorado River Systm. During Winter 1, 10 squawfish were radiotracked for <br />590.8 total observation hours, from which 118 hours were used to develop <br />habitat utilization criteria. During the fall and winter of the second year, <br />74 observation hours were accumulated on 10 squawfish. Of these, 34 hours <br />were used to develop winter habitat utilization criteria on depth, velocity <br />and substrate. Squawfish were often active within a particular habitat but <br />they did not move outside the river reach they selected for over wintering. <br />Squawfish shored fidelity to very specific habitat areas by remaining in <br />either one or a few favorite habitats throughout the winter. During the ice <br />covered period, total range of movement of all fish averaged only 0.3 miles <br />each year. several squawfish deaonstrated fidelity to specific fall and <br />winter habitats and river reaches over one or more years. During winter 1, <br />embayment, backwater, and run habitats were most frequently used. Pool and <br />run habitat were used most often in Winter 2. Habitat use also differed <br />between the three study areas. This appeared related to habitat availability <br />and diversity. A backwater habitat was used almost exclusively by three fish <br />in the GOVeri'riTlent Bridge study area, river mile (M) 95-100, during Winter 1. <br />Run habitat was used most frequently the next year probably because channel <br />bed changes prevented access to the area used most frequently in Winter 1. <br />Embayment and run habitat appeared to be preferred over pool habitat in the <br />Maybell study area (RMI 70-82) which had diverse habitat availability. Pool <br />habitat was used almost exclusively in the Lily Park study area (IM 51-54), <br />in Winter 2, where pool habitat was dominant. Effective depth (ice free water <br />under packed frazil and/or solid ice cover) and velocity utilization for each _ <br />trip were averaged over the winter period for three habitat categories. <br />Shallowest mean effective depths (2 feet) and velocities [0.1 feet/second <br />(ft/s) ] were from backwater and embayment habitats. Eddys and pools had the <br />deepest average effective depth utilization (3.3 feet) with an average mean <br />velocity of 0.2 ft/s. The run and shoreline habitat category had the highest <br />average velocity (0.5 ft/s) with an average effective depth of 2.4 feet. <br />Naturally stable flow conditions allowed ice cover to exist throughout the <br />majority of the winter period both years. Flaws and air temperatures were <br />above normal in winter 1 and below normal in Winter 2. <br />. Formaticn of different types of ice on the Yampa River changed hydraulic <br />conditions. During early winter, water surface elevations were maintained in <br />spite of reductions in discharge. During Winter 2, changes in effective <br />depths used by squawfish were examined at the Maybell study site by comparing <br />elevation changes of water surface, ice surface, and ice thickness in response <br />to changes in discharge. Discharge increased tthout most of Winter 2, a <br />relatively low water year, ranging from 142 cfs on December 15, 1987 to 340 <br />cfs on March 3, 1988. Ice thickness increased from 0.85 feet December 15, <br />1987 to 2.12 feet March 15, 1988. Increasing water surface elevations <br />compensated for increasing ice thickness resulting in relatively stable <br />effective depth. Effective depths measured biweekly in embayment habitat <br />between December 15 and February 17 varied only 0.1 feet. Regression analysis <br /> <br />of discharge on water surface elevation was used to predict the effect of , <br />hypothetical reductions in flaw below the lowest measured discharge of 142 <br />cfs. For each 20 cfs loss in discharge, water surface elevation was predicted <br />viii