Laserfiche WebLink
<br />encountered problems when the rate of inbreeding was 1% or lower per <br />generation. However, some animal breeders will allow inbreeding to <br />increase between 2% and 3%. A maximum of 1% in the inbreeding rate is <br />recommended for wild populations (Simberloff 1988). The acceptability of <br />the "500" value was proposed for genetic drift based on one trait in a <br />fruit fly. Both values of this "50/500" rule have been disputed and no <br />magic numbers or specific rules appear to be valid for propagation of <br />animals (Simberloff 1988). Inbreeding is of particular importance <br />because it has been demonstrated that a consequence of inbreeding <br />depression in brother-sister matings for some species will result in <br />offspring that are sterile or inviable after several generations (Lande <br />1988). The 1% maximum inbreeding rate recommended by Simberloff (1988) <br />for wild populations should be used as a target for an effective <br />population size in developing broodstocks of the endangered Colorado <br />River fishes. <br />Allendorf (1993) recommended stocking equal numbers of offspring of <br />family lots from pedigreed matings. This practice will reduce the <br />potential for loss of genetic diversity. Philipp et al. (1993) <br />recommended that genetic characterization of captive-reared fish be <br />compared with wild stocks to ensure that the genetic diversity is <br />similar. <br />I. Ideal Number of Founders for Broodstock Development. The designation of <br />"endangered" to any organism under the Endangered Species Act implies <br />that the numbers of wild organisms are limited. The basic goal in an <br />captive propagation program is to maintain the genetic diversity of <br />captive broodstocks that is similar to the parent wild stock. Simberloff <br />(1988) emphasized that general agreement does not exist about the <br />absolute numbers of animals needed to maintain genetic diversity in <br />captive propagation programs. <br />To achieve Simberloff's recommendation of keeping the maximum rate of <br />inbreeding at 1% or lower, an effective population size of fifty parents <br />(25 males and 25 females) is needed for development of a broodstock. <br />Mating of one male with one female is desirable to maximize the genetic <br />contribution from all fish used as parents (Allendorf 1993). This <br />strategy of 25 paired matings is recommended as a target for an effective <br />population size in the captive propagation of endangered Colorado River <br />fishes. This strategy was designated as "Priority 1" in Box 10 for the <br />maximization of genetic diversity in broodstock development. The <br />fertilized eggs from mating one male and one female (i.e., 1 family lot) <br />should be divided and reared in separate facilities to avoid the total <br />loss of the genetic contribution from those two parents through an <br />accident or catastrophe. <br />It is desirable to mate the 25 pairs of endangered fish in one year <br />because broodstocks would mature at the same time so that equal numbers <br />of all family lots could be produced and stocked from parents of the same <br />age. This procedure would eliminate many variables that could influence <br />genetic diversity and stocking success. <br />If sufficient numbers of endangered fish are in the wild, the goal would <br />be to increase wild recruitment until self-sustaining populations are <br />realized to meet the carrying capacity of available habitat. However, <br />for declining endangered fish stocks with little or no recruitment, <br />26 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />11 <br /> <br />