Laserfiche WebLink
<br />sites and is considered the most mobile of the endangered Colorado <br />River fishes (Tyus 1991). The razorback sucker exhibits moderate <br />migrational movements (Tyus and Karp 1991). Some humpback chub <br />stocks (e.g., the stocks in Black Rocks and Westwater Canyons in the <br />Colorado River) do not migrate for spawning (Kaeding et al. 1990) <br />but a lower basin humpback chub stock spawns in the Little Colorado <br />River and uses the mainstem Colorado River in the Grand Canyon during <br />the remainder of the year (Kaeding and Zimmerman 1983). Bonytail <br />movements have not been studied in the upper basin since that species <br />became extremely rare before detailed studies of the endangered <br />fishes were conducted. <br />Dams have fragmented the habitat in the upper basin preventing free <br />movement of the endangered fishes. Therefore, some of the geographic <br />separation among stocks is due to altered habitats. Some interchange <br />has been documented for several razorback sucker, humpback chub, and <br />Colorado squawfish stocks. In most cases, only a few fish were known <br />to move between different river reaches during the spawning season in <br />different years. A small amount of interchange among stocks is a <br />natural phenomenon that provides for evolutionary processes to occur. <br />Stocks with limited interchange will be classified separately until <br />adequate information is available to justify combining these stocks. <br />This conservative classification will prevent or minimize the risk of <br />losing unique genetic attributes of any stock that may be important <br />in the recovery effort. <br />4. Genetic Identification and Characterization of Stocks. The genetic <br />diversity of endangered fish stocks in the Upper Colorado River Basin <br />will be characterized by identifying genetic markers through <br />appropriate techniques such as electrophoresis for protein analysis <br />and restriction enzyme analysis for DNA. In some cases, <br />morphological analyses are used to identify and characterize fish <br />stocks. Genetic markers are useful in restoration of endangered <br />species because they can be used to characterize the genetic <br />diversity among stocks and can be used to maintain genetic diversity <br />in captive propagation programs that is similar to the parent wild <br />stocks (Allendorf and Phelps 1987; Allendorf and Ryman 1987; Gauldie <br />1981; Hynes et al. 1981). Verification of inheritance patterns and <br />genetic characters is extremely important to ensure that the markers <br />have a genetic basis and are not due to other factors such as <br />environmental differences, development stage of fish that are <br />sampled, or treatment of samples (Kapuscinski and Jacobson 1987). Ir <br />addition, early detection of inadvertent introgression from stocking <br />will allow changes in stocking procedures that could preserve the <br />genetic integrity of remaining wild endangered fish stocks (Hynes et <br />al. 1981). <br />Genetic (genotypic) and systematic (phenotypic) analyses will be <br />directed at the identification and characterization of endangered <br />fish stocks in the upper basin. The genetic analyses of the Colorado <br />squawfish and razorback sucker from the upper basin will be provided <br />in a final report that is scheduled for completion during 1994. An <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />