My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9314
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:52:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9314
Author
Wick, E. J. and J. A. Hawkins.
Title
Colorado Squawfish Winter Habitat Study.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
genetic diversity in offspring from full-sib (Al X A1) or half-sib (Al X A2) <br />crosses. The resulting offspring of the full-sib cross is illustrated in the <br />lower left diagram and the half-sib cross is illustrated in the lower center <br />diagram. A rather detailed explanation of the di-allele cross accompanies Figure <br />3 to explain its use in maintaining genetic diversity. <br />If space is limited for propagation of all family lots resulting from a 5 X 5 di- <br />allele cross, maintaining separate groups of the 5 unique family lots represented <br />in the diagonal cells would be preferred to maintaining the 20 other matings. <br />These 5 family lots contain the entire genetic contribution from the 10 parents. <br />If adult fish are extremely rare and five fish of each sex cannot be obtained, <br />factorial matings (Kapuscinski et al. 1993) will be used to increase the genetic <br />contribution from the least numerous sex (See Box 10,Item 4). <br />After a broodstock has been developed from a 5 X 5 cross or a factorial mating, <br />additional wild fish should be used to supplement the genetic contribution of the <br />parent stock until a minimum effective population size of 50 is achieved (See Box <br />10, Item 5). Additional lots from mating one male with one female should replace <br />the half-sib lots in the di-allele cross to maximize the genetic contribution from <br />the wild parents. <br />In some situations, it may be feasible to spawn wild fish at the site of capture <br />and return them to the habitat from where they were collected. However, in most <br />situations, fish will be captured, transported to holding facilities, and held <br />until they can be spawned. The stress of capture and transporting may prevent <br />potential broodstock from spawning during the year of capture. Even if fish spawn <br />in the year of capture or a subsequent year, wild adults may be retained at the <br />refuge or hatchery for an additional year to ensure that F1 progeny survive from <br />the initial spawning. <br />VI. GUIDELINES FOR DISPOSITION OF CAPTIVE-REARED ENDANGERED AND CANDIDATE FISH <br />A. Background. Many propagation activities may produce more fish than are needed to <br />meet specified requirements. This additional production allows the hatchery <br />manager to compensate for unknown or unpredictable attrition rates and ensure that <br />specified requirements are met. These guidelines provide the protocol for <br />disposition of such fish. <br />Planned captive propagation minimizes the production of endangered or candidate <br />fish that will be excess to program needs. The number of fish that are reared <br />depends upon: <br />1. Captive propagation goals and objectives <br />2. Breeding strategy or mating system used <br />3. Fecundity of the fish <br />4. Anticipated mortality during culture <br />5. Method used to culture fish <br />6. Uncertainty of production during captive culture <br />7. Availability of culture facilities <br />24
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.