My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9314
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:52:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9314
Author
Wick, E. J. and J. A. Hawkins.
Title
Colorado Squawfish Winter Habitat Study.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
may be affected by these risks and the hatchery activities that may cause <br />the risks are summarized in Box 4. <br />C. General Guidelines for Reintroduction of Captive-Reared Fish. Suitable <br />habitat must be available in areas that are proposed for reintroduction to <br />increase the likelihood of success. The reasons for holding, rearing, and <br />stocking endangered and candidate fishes are summarized in Box 5. Criteria <br />for holding, rearing, or stocking captive-reared fish, and action required <br />are provided in Box 6. General guidelines for preparing <br />reintroduction/augmentation plans are summarized in Box 7. <br />Reasons for Maintaining Genetic Diversity in Captive Propagation Programs. <br />The major objective of a captive propagation program is to develop <br />broodstocks and produce offspring that have genetic characteristics similar <br />to those of the founding population. The purposes of a captive propagation <br />program are; (1) to facilitate recovery (i.e., development of self- <br />sustaining populations), and (2) to maintain artificial genetic refugia for <br />fish species or stocks that may be susceptible to extinction. Managing <br />captive populations to maintain existing natural genetic diversity preserves <br />future options for effective management and recovery of the taxon by fish <br />and wildlife managers (Ralls and Ballou 1992; Thomas 1990). <br />The natural genetic diversity within a population is associated with its <br />evolutionary history and is important for adaptation, long-term survival, <br />and maximum productivity in the wild. Protecting genetic diversity within <br />hatchery broodstock prevents artificial selection, inbreeding, and genetic <br />drift which frequently occurs in hatchery programs (Allendorf 1993). The <br />concept of "maximally protecting genetic diversity" within a hatchery stock <br />assumes that a sufficient number of randomly sampled individuals from the <br />appropriate donor stock were used. The broodstock will then reflect the <br />genetic characteristics of the donor stock. Proper broodstock development <br />during the founding phase is fundamental in the recovery of species. <br />The importance of maintaining detailed and accurate records cannot be <br />overemphasized. Records should include the origin, genetic profile, and <br />unique identifying number of each adult broodfish as well as its production <br />record and progeny performance. Genetic characteristics of broodstocks <br />and progeny must be known so that reintroduction or augmentation efforts can <br />be monitored and evaluated to determine survival of hatchery-reared fish and <br />their interaction with wild stocks (Gauldie 1991; Hynes et al. 1981). <br />Broodstock Development. The first priority for obtaining founders for a <br />broodstock is to only use fish from the appropriate wild stocks or <br />populations. Selection will be made using acceptable breeding strategies <br />that will maintain genetic diversity similar to the wild stock (Kapuscinski <br />et al. 1993). If the stock or population has been <br />15
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.